Re: [Idr] [Responses for the comments during the IETF108] New Version Notification for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-01.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 05 August 2020 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C11A3A0C44 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JYoKVrtR3S4p for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1A8F3A0C36 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id l23so19238302edv.11 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 09:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=V7udJ/iZ7xm6DpDJT68idGvpnyUa8UXDWOHGkZ4rys4=; b=Nnjj/GgNb0CfhWvW7qx/3ishAdEUmirfDmF14eeQ5VY46sseitTPErU6T9xuA51gtL MeIDGv6D/svgDscJaTGF85UkWBvXqHOEZ20b/dXd5mTtjzE0JxYCg2pSDtP2MkisGqhA xgihwCGFDtPMan+HrS0O+LKGYzb7gPVfWGtZA09QxBnt80i/qz8oZZncqlKkkEuk5sGx T0tyk/fA9IKLzaXg/XEx9wLhOWEUVuFw1uXrGXvqQQYLzkcZXadu9LMjNfibHRWW7Q5x aRisV7VVEQ6jDmbLxEpfvGyHmrJN0H0QTjb/N1oN/wm6gFWru/VxLAOJHdoUA6GBvoKG ZbxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V7udJ/iZ7xm6DpDJT68idGvpnyUa8UXDWOHGkZ4rys4=; b=PU8zvaZJUVqiQ/2CZ+sIOpVY5/oBAiNx1eWQyHv2xh9n4/RxCudIgodnuiSnxIW4GK PVjHfLiQKO870HraBkX4jaB9Fd8+IHEM/hxYtmENVsJ8aIwSc1VcqXj1ZS/ijo36Rgk6 Kb3JWyDIhoS4dVBeLVeZzbiC/1iARC0I7v2k2ee/iFEZSyJ3IWl5LeQM1/p0DiIaMFd5 f+C0oE0jagvWrTWF5lmzVgVZ1fzYbTl86IJbtonRp8zeK3+ZrOI7jiup55l+qjUFZvex Im4le/Rfb+hlff5AFhIWdhOsenOnlcPebN9HGGiEKDPVyQk1BFytvul+sA3RM2/FgEU+ gRlg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dg6XrAv2mJTijaPuQIlYK+Lhdr39GXLWcHWu5WOcfWS4eLBov 40cEueNKUky9y3iZq20g8yWb1JUw7JNQV5IdXJhc9A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzK3p4Fjt7owJoGiJ0kNRoAeaR+v5UpCJR4RY7WF2hbcyByXfje++2q6lH6ljc8mAAO4ORi/C5V7YxnKDTRjHk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:a5b:: with SMTP id bt27mr37390edb.120.1596644064050; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 09:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOj+MMFDwoJqNY0pXBQEffVMv9-JukKSAmqZ3qMYySMKKD=i+Q@mail.gmail.com> <29F33044-129F-4C22-82BB-F3A01447594E@tsinghua.org.cn>
In-Reply-To: <29F33044-129F-4C22-82BB-F3A01447594E@tsinghua.org.cn>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:14:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMHzritvnTE=wbojZJz52Ww38CPz32oY=cDEM9zcPUPgfQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
Cc: Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>, idr <idr@ietf.org>, wangw36@chinatelecom.cn
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000045582605ac23aa58"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/CxN468-b8WQg63tVm8wOj07EicI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Responses for the comments during the IETF108] New Version Notification for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 16:14:27 -0000

> [WAJ] The VPN routes imported in these VRFs can’t use the same RD, or
> else, the VPN prefixes in different VRFs will collision on RR.
>

Nothing will "collide" on RRs.

NLRI = RD+Prefix  not just the RD.

So you may have completely different prefixes sourced by the same VRF going
to completely different VRFs on same or different PEs.

Kind regards,
R.