Re: [Idr] [spring] [ALU] Re: IDR WG 2 week WG LC ondraft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 21 February 2017 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC10C129415; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:05:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K25WuMO4_sdZ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:05:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ECB112943B; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:05:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.36.164.147;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Giles Heron'" <giles.heron@gmail.com>, "'Bertrand Duvivier \(bduvivie\)'" <bduvivie@cisco.com>
References: <00f901d287e4$16ecb2f0$44c618d0$@ndzh.com> <1E319B28-BF06-4BEB-9D27-552530FC21EA@gmail.com> <B3307E12-4431-4B23-84C6-A0BE9BA511AF@alcatel-lucent.com> <D4CC701C.752F0%bduvivie@cisco.com> <F8AB5E9A-87FA-4E75-86CD-9DA9C0D9AEEB@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F8AB5E9A-87FA-4E75-86CD-9DA9C0D9AEEB@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:01:27 -0500
Message-ID: <017001d28bd5$a6c85f10$f4591d30$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0171_01D28BAB.BDF404C0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJT2wOnmfqsL5/KzR2EzWLnKupfBQFcWVRrAi7YyF4ChPeZ0gMNybK2oCcFdmA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/D3jhsEfCO9fnihQWHI5onPklkxM>
Cc: idr@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org, "'Van De Velde, Gunter \(Nokia - BE\)'" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [spring] [ALU] Re: IDR WG 2 week WG LC ondraft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:05:49 -0000

Giles: 

 

It would be helpful to fill out the wiki on the “SHOULD, MAY and MUSTs”.   If it is easier, you can just send me the answers and I will post it. 

 

Sue 

 

From: Giles Heron [mailto:giles.heron@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 9:28 AM
To: Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie)
Cc: Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE); Susan Hares; idr@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] [Idr] [ALU] Re: IDR WG 2 week WG LC ondraft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)

 

Likewise.

 

And it’s worth noting that OpenDaylight has an open-source implementation of the draft, and interops ok with IOS XR.  I may get around to testing interop with NX-OS also.

 

Giles

 

On 17 Feb 2017, at 08:21, Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie) <bduvivie@cisco.com> wrote:

 

Fully support, yes. 

 

Best Regards Bertrand Duvivier

 


On Feb 15, 2017, at 23:34, Susan Hares < <mailto:shares@ndzh.com> shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

This begins a 2 week IDR WG last call on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe from (2/15 to 3/1/2017)    There are two implementations describe on the wiki at:

 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe%20> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe%20

 

The two implementation are from  Cisco IOS-XR release 6.0.2 and Cisco Nexus Switch N9000/N3000 platforms running NX-OS 7.0(3)I1(1) or greater.   The authors will indicate on the list and in the wiki the following information :

 

1)       Were these implementations separate implementations?

BD> YES 

2)       What were the results of the interoperability tests?

BD > WORKING

 

This work is linked to the draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe work in the SPRING WG. Based on the two drafts, the WG should might consider:  

1)       Is there need for this work in deployments in networks/

2)       Is this technically ready for publication?

3)       Does it fit with the spring informational draft?

 

For the ease of reference the web references are below:

 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe/> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe/

 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe/> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe/

 

Sue Hares 

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
 <mailto:spring@ietf.org> spring@ietf.org
 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
 <mailto:spring@ietf.org> spring@ietf.org
 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring