Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC (draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)
Curtis Villamizar <curtis@occnc.com> Wed, 11 October 2006 20:42 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXkuG-00056M-PV; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:42:24 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXkqa-0002ui-JI; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:38:36 -0400
Received: from [69.37.59.173] (helo=workhorse.brookfield.occnc.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXkdU-0003A5-Ro; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:25:06 -0400
Received: from workhorse.brookfield.occnc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by workhorse.brookfield.occnc.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k9BL4Fn3071983; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:04:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from curtis@workhorse.brookfield.occnc.com)
Message-Id: <200610112104.k9BL4Fn3071983@workhorse.brookfield.occnc.com>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC (draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:03:51 +0200." <17926D0F-52F1-41C7-8ECC-601D72F017AD@muada.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:04:15 -0400
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@occnc.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@cisco.com>, idr@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: curtis@occnc.com
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org
In message <17926D0F-52F1-41C7-8ECC-601D72F017AD@muada.com> Iljitsch van Beijnum writes: > > On 11-okt-2006, at 22:32, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > > > How the protocol encodes an atribute does not impact how that > > attribute is displayed in the CLI and therefore how or whether an RE > > syntax could be used in policy statements. > > I don't understand how these statements relate to the discussion at > hand. You are right - type first think later is a bad idea. In any case it is fine to represent AS as big decimal numbers since there is no real need to run RE over an adjacent set of numbers in policy statements or sets of numbers with common values in the top part. Adding a dot or colon might upset some REs in existing policy. Curtis _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-b… The IESG
- [Idr] Re: Last Call: 'Canonical representation of… John Leslie
- Re: [Idr] Re: Last Call: 'Canonical representatio… Joe Abley
- Re: [Idr] Re: Last Call: 'Canonical representatio… Scott Leibrand
- Re: [Idr] Re: Last Call: 'Canonical representatio… Bill Fenner
- RE: [Idr] Re: Last Call: 'Canonical representatio… Bruno Rijsman
- Re: [Idr] Re: Last Call: 'Canonical representatio… Joe Abley
- Re: [Idr] Re: Last Call: 'Canonical representatio… Geoff Huston
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Idr] Re: Last Call: 'Canonical representatio… Vince Fuller
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of… Joe Abley