IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-33: (with COMMENT)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 30 July 2019 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586421201D5; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vR7yq1nivF8l; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 558BC12023D; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1hsY9z-0002lt-FG; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 19:51:47 +0000
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:51:46 -0700
Message-ID: <m27e7zxpv1.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "\"Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker\"" <noreply@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages@ietf.org, jgs@juniper.net, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jie.dong@huawei.com, idr-chairs@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <156449387998.2643.18137174091685834097.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <156449387998.2643.18137174091685834097.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/DLOi4fpfCT6RZi_8gHElwVufyJw>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-33: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 19:52:02 -0000

i believe this is the only outstanding point from mirja's careful review
(tyvm)

> 3) sec 4:
> s/then it must NOT be sent to the neighbor/then it MUST NOT be sent to the neighbor/and
> s/it must be withdrawn from service/it MUST be withdrawn from service/

i have no problem with this change.  does someone want to make an
argument that 4271 being normative obviates normative language here?

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email