Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-20

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Tue, 07 March 2017 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D6D129473; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:08:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XurPI5tiYrET; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:08:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EEDB1294EC; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:08:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=806; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1488924538; x=1490134138; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=cfyOKq+6bGCXNOIZEE1oB8MhceplAM0dSaUcHGrUYFE=; b=MEoAgoTsvnJSOYMOlL1KKaf/3WUtYZfXcb9XX+UCpXQbfzP0LI+OGP4X Y+Uqs2iP53jMwoA5fPqqhIzGucEXyE8uPhxQGecxCzOb9BPqXFWrxVVnM +wCrCcUk9xYA1PQyNVqWYgDIlVVRe1Lcj0ZsBO7ZRg1UylHHduV+KG6zq 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CYAQDoLr9Y/4ENJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1GBaweDWIoMkUuVN4INhiICGoIRPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWAQQ?= =?us-ascii?q?BIxFFBQsCAQgODAImAgICMBUQAgQBDQWJdwiwX4IminwBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEdgQuFQ4IFgmqHWi6CMQEElXeGOQGSNoFjGIUiigKIQ4p3AR84gQN?= =?us-ascii?q?WFVABhkJ1iQaBDQEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,260,1486425600"; d="scan'208";a="394074121"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 07 Mar 2017 22:08:57 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v27M8vDj028416 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:08:57 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:08:56 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:08:56 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "'Randy Bush'" <randy@psg.com>
Thread-Topic: AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-20
Thread-Index: AQHSjglrFbHoeYS2WUyxb/MV1DegzqGGUcQAgADRzICAAu/0AA==
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:08:56 +0000
Message-ID: <0BBC61A9-758C-44FF-B36E-9C41399EDCCB@cisco.com>
References: <DAEE98CC-8483-499E-B71C-FE4C6FC15A4A@cisco.com> <m2tw78rwrh.wl-randy@psg.com> <000201d295ed$8824b320$986e1960$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <000201d295ed$8824b320$986e1960$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <97CF658AC125B74C86FE029288F4D673@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/DgU2wImOJoRgyMHYfh_gBFxjwSU>
Cc: "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-20
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 22:08:59 -0000

On 3/5/17, 3:17 PM, "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>; wrote:

Sue:

Hi!

> A few point have raised my disagreement regarding the AD reviews.   At this
> point, the text is at odds with RFC4271.   If you feel RFC4271, does not
> speak about these issues - you may have missed why the BGP FSM is there.
> Please change your text. 

I’m not sure why you disagree with my comments…but if I interpret your points correctly, I think you’re saying that this document should also update the FSM where needed, is that right?  If so, then I agree with that.

Thanks!

Alvaro.