IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG Last Call foir draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages (11/12 to 11/26)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 28 November 2017 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E6B128D6F; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:40:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b78LkrokSBfO; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:40:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22e.google.com (mail-wr0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8697712894A; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:40:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id l22so1193244wrc.11; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:40:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=k2V3GRYFLpin6fvh+Vpr4C25PDDGnqtQ3fWNnGFDY2o=; b=NyExmX7HR3b/JT9pyyCCxWLZ9olpdIox+Q5mZT8IqFD3NjRlXDz+m5/aNMmthOvc7W +YwpvAXIEArrMFlSn17doB82lQgxm/hCc6UxmRja1AX9QdJQ/WeGoF3jPK62FzFyLvn6 jjQAg6DGHZZ6clFND0jjIDHsWL9SBJBk6Jk+I+YmN0O4TmmoAD1MFZ2AZHjLBPknokCM tczyi79eNxe/6xnanc2T0AGjStUHMMMzC9+t4c5IbqsmZWytpkAtHnFay3Shh8c8kkk1 jljSRX+HrU+X23xZt2KVbDTvhARoSFmLQakx3Y2Y0Dunc3SrLoUSEsFXlxIqBSRQAqwG MpHg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k2V3GRYFLpin6fvh+Vpr4C25PDDGnqtQ3fWNnGFDY2o=; b=gF7od8xwz8BAUr1VE7sJxDjnN1DaLjQEvLTtc8Snn1N57NTc3v+nXIQvigGQMwU7IP S6dsfDvH11XwUoT7+dSuW41vEeEQ9zqUe7/Vl3D+0eVwU0JE0gVQRGlfo00owUl0mAGb niNLQrPpdMIMfBQ61sFmgxE72l7YeccFEbtkD3NbqC2A/Cp4crD6l5O6K+4ICKxefF6Y Z3szEdVqCIJgi4b++5WkWI+QwzoJ+H9qVZ1Zoctql07tzUTgzy4BA7yGUvD+8k/NRerI i3ede8bvpwZjlbXQkwZ7s57g40acgGrE5ae9UvgTboXQ+weQt+YW2vVGZtmkmYsZP1wU eNvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX43hBtxvvuOSHMWAbrpSji7qHhuBqGGcOdiFIPTiPN8VCZp4nUN PwUTMYvAaiBM7+KfNmQdVN5mzJDvdJ5oiuE3mySTgEeV
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbL1q1rcQeWY234xId/lFNiseGaH6vY5gft1BdUOhHYPTc8kiz1Z726TedJzGxbJ3suaXnjwI+pKz5UGNw+9A0=
X-Received: by 10.223.183.39 with SMTP id l39mr196911wre.175.1511898049884; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:40:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.28.54.217 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:40:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20171128194048.GV16871@pfrc.org>
References: <88d5df779a344b588745108c771d3145@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <deae6e85c3ff47a6bbcac176eb91bd3e@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <F0EAF2D4-656D-48BD-830B-DC2E8B862813@nist.gov> <A0106E1A-272D-4E1D-A0F3-E3531D583AA3@cisco.com> <1D2FD437-0EEF-4FF6-9853-C09E7EEA2A15@nist.gov> <2B92A151-5A78-46EE-8A46-C09603A37219@cisco.com> <20171128183312.GT16871@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ER=mECP4XkYB1txcyWgOcEfcY3-y8BsAPPy0skPp6TO0Sw@mail.gmail.com> <20171128191457.GU16871@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ERmwWiSy4=jGqKR2Dk_2aNcAAxN=cu8dcTG6BcJfuY5JyA@mail.gmail.com> <20171128194048.GV16871@pfrc.org>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:40:49 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: QDV8FvaCvqMD0iZTv2Got0GNRBI
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=OJVsqTLhTgET5+1P8HAe9OByy7e8W3q036FhwwQgJPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, "idr-ads@ietf.org" <idr-ads@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043868bc333d5b055f10324e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Dyl7x8HSHgJIEZvdSRJ4EbnD-Ns>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Last Call foir draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages (11/12 to 11/26)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:40:53 -0000

> bgpsec implementations are likely to deploy extended messages in tandem.

Is this just your assumption or is this enforced in any IETF document ?

This is important news no one earlier mentioned in this entire thread.

Thx

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email