Re: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - 1 week extension [10/14 to 10/21/2019]

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 25 October 2019 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005DA120118 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.246
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.246 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LqR6KLB7N723 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 362B5120072 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.170.20.155;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'idr wg'" <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 10:33:15 -0400
Message-ID: <00e701d58b41$23b61bd0$6b225370$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00E8_01D58B1F.9CA5B450"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdWLP/NecPouL6iETluvHTd9zkFRtw==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 191023-2, 10/23/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/E1seIckqKhp2JT_hSvDxDemWhLk>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - 1 week extension [10/14 to 10/21/2019]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:33:20 -0000

Greeting: 

 

It seems I asked the questions about these two drafts to the correct places
(IDR and Spring). 

 

These two drafts have enough interest to become IDR WG drafts.  Please
submit the following: 

 

.         draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt  as
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-0.txt

.         draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt as
draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-00.txt. 

 

The authors should carefully pay attention to the email. 

 

I expect from the authors to send an email to IDR with the following:

a)       a summary of comments received on WG adoption call, 

b)      Plans for refining and progressing their drafts, and 

c)       status of any implementations.

 

A big thanks to all who comment on these drafts.  A special thanks to Bruno
Decraene who provided extra insight on the links to Spring technologies. 

 

Susan Hares