IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Wed, 05 October 2016 18:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854551293FB for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 11:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ydtp7TODnEa for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 11:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C571293E4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 11:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dresden.attlocal.net (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D9151E337; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 14:17:03 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_71DD2284-13C4-497B-9E8B-82A1BD0C2D5D"
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20161005161741.GY20697@Vurt.local>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:15:15 -0400
Message-Id: <87D04902-FD4A-4400-AC9C-4D1CA85AFE6C@pfrc.org>
References: <147531113077.4216.12599976309263776317.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161001085434.GW20697@Vurt.local> <005b01d21d58$aaf869e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20161003095936.GC20697@Vurt.local> <57F51937.70103@foobar.org> <4C5E4C28-E26F-44C3-A661-514328180F6E@pfrc.org> <20161005161741.GY20697@Vurt.local>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Ef0Zv7eZK5Pw8u0WECGd8fzBMYo>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 18:15:20 -0000

> On Oct 5, 2016, at 12:17 PM, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> wrote:
> 
> The "Textual Representation" section should provide any implementor with
> enough freedom to use a prefix, suffix, or a separator of their
> choosing. Given the current text:
> https://github.com/large-bgp-communities/large-bgp-communities/blob/master/draft-ietf-idr-large-community.xml#L208-L232 <https://github.com/large-bgp-communities/large-bgp-communities/blob/master/draft-ietf-idr-large-community.xml#L208-L232>
> should we change the first three "MUST" to a "SHOULD" to alleviate your
> concern?

Minor nit: RFC 1997 never uses colon-format.  1998 does.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email