Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/30 to 4/13

Susan Hares <> Tue, 28 April 2020 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627D03A155D for <>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.224
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.275, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7VNfaGDqRAhP for <>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 855C43A156D for <>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <>
To: "'Chengli (Cheng Li)'" <>,
References: <005201d61ca9$71152430$533f6c90$> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:25:44 -0400
Message-ID: <00a801d61d60$85ed36b0$91c7a410$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00A9_01D61D3E.FEDF1920"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHYIZzeOOzq/uO4/lfIasGbYGMbBQJlJUMrqHdUfHA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200427-0, 04/27/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/30 to 4/13
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:26:01 -0000



Please send a note to the list when you address the issues from Ketan, Aijun
and Linda. 


Thanks, Susan Hares 


From: Chengli (Cheng Li) [] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 6:27 AM
To: Susan Hares;
Subject: RE: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/30 to 4/13


Hi Susan,


Thank you for your notification. Already uploaded the text.


Also, we updated the error handling rules to align with the rules defined in
draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy. Also, added text of Implementation


Will address the comments from Ketan and Aijun and Linda ASAP. Many thanks!


Best Regards,





A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-01.txt

has been successfully submitted by Cheng Li and posted to the IETF


Name:                  draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu

Revision:              01

Title:                      Segment Routing Path MTU in BGP

Document date:               2020-04-28

Group:                  idr

Pages:                   9








   Segment Routing is a source routing paradigm that explicitly

   indicates the forwarding path for packets at the ingress node.  An SR

   policy is a set of candidate SR paths consisting of one or more

   segment lists with necessary path attributes.  However, the path

   maximum transmission unit (MTU) information for SR path is not

   available in the SR policy since the SR does not require signaling.

   This document defines extensions to BGP to distribute path MTU

   information within SR policies.





Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at


The IETF Secretariat



From: Idr [] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 11:35 PM
Subject: [Idr] draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 3/30 to 4/13


The comment period on the adoption of draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt
has completed.

The IDR WG has reached consensus to adopt this draft. 


The authors should submit this draft as


Cheerily, Susan Hares