IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-snijders-idr-shutdown (11/16 to 11/30)

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Thu, 17 November 2016 01:35 UTC

Return-Path: <job@ntt.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA1B1294DC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:35:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.432
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.432 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8mmzpiyv2omq for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:35:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.dllstx09.us.to.gin.ntt.net (mail3.dllstx09.us.to.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:3ff:5::26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F79D1293FD for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:35:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail3.dllstx09.us.to.gin.ntt.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <job@ntt.net>) id 1c7Bbm-00065r-12 (job@us.ntt.net); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:35:22 +0000
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:35:17 +0900
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Message-ID: <20161117013517.GH22270@dhcp-9341.meeting.ietf.org>
References: <013f01d2404d$3dfff610$b9ffe230$@ndzh.com> <CA+b+ERne1pibWJnsqKXmwmAFbtgstSa1Z8BRje3pjDLdoGkeZw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERne1pibWJnsqKXmwmAFbtgstSa1Z8BRje3pjDLdoGkeZw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/FB5FsGPG3hNsLMGgVnwxnh2Vc5U>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-snijders-idr-shutdown (11/16 to 11/30)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:35:24 -0000

Hi Robert,

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:24:13AM +0100, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> I support adoption of this draft.
> 
> One suggestion for text clarification.
> 
> The draft says:
> 
> " It is RECOMMENDED that a BGP speaker receiving a Shutdown
>    Communication observe retry behaviour in line with the RFC4486
>    [RFC4486] behaviour for "Administrative Shutdown" (sec 4.0)."
> 
> This means that new cease subtype defined here would be effectively
> replacing subcode 2 of cease msg as defined by RFC4486 (when string to
> be send is configured). Perhaps text in the draft could state it
> explicitely.

Thanks for the feedback.

Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email