IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-19, reverting to consensus text on opaque typed NLRI

Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at> Tue, 10 March 2020 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <c@tix.at>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646A63A0CE0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fmCVKLrl9zUc for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hated.at (mail.hated.at [IPv6:2001:858:2:8::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A52723A0CDC for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 80-110-113-91.cgn.dynamic.surfer.at ([80.110.113.91] helo=[192.168.66.207]) by mail.hated.at with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <c@tix.at>) id 1jBlv6-0003eR-K1; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:56:09 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>
In-Reply-To: <5AAEF30F-BE63-423F-91AD-FD420C514D0E@tix.at>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:56:07 +0100
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <811A62AF-5956-4C8D-8581-C36F36DCB6DE@tix.at>
References: <E10898AF-C1D6-49AA-88E4-2CB66EB7B3B4@juniper.net> <5AAEF30F-BE63-423F-91AD-FD420C514D0E@tix.at>
To: John Scudder <jgs=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/FL2ZZkecS7PzXEv0_oj9VbO4JHE>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-19, reverting to consensus text on opaque typed NLRI
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:56:13 -0000

Hi,

> On 10.03.2020, at 10:14, Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for sorting that out. Draft submission is closed now, however I attached the to-be-20 version of draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis for the record and will submit the draft when the tool opens again. 

Since the submission tool just reopened I uploaded the -20 (thanks Alvaro for the pointer):

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis/

Cheers Christoph

-- 
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status