[Idr] WG Adoption call (2nd post) - draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt [11/3 to 11/17/2019]

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Sun, 03 November 2019 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0230912008F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 11:08:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.347
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pd65IuPaLSDI for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 11:08:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 755EE12008C for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 11:08:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.170.20.155;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 14:08:12 -0500
Message-ID: <001101d5927a$09fe8c00$1dfba400$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01D59250.212ACDF0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdWSeb/dqPJstGJnTOWfrEN2Z8GiNg==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 191102-0, 11/02/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Fh2-si9h7rbg5i30uG47tIbS4po>
Subject: [Idr] WG Adoption call (2nd post) - draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt [11/3 to 11/17/2019]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 19:08:18 -0000

Greetings IDR: 

 

The adoption call for  draft-farrell-idr-bgp-ls-registry-02.txt  was
inconclusive.  

We had clear support, but just not enough response. 

This lack of response was probably due to my errors in posting the 

name of the draft (pardon my error Adrian) [Blush..] 

 

To make this easier, the current draft is: 

 

draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03/ 

which you can get at; 

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry/

 

This draft proposes to refine the instructions for RFC7752 

"Border Gateway Protocol - Link   State (BGP-LS) Parameters Registry"

from Designated Expert to  Expert Review.  

 

These are both technical reviews prior to assignments of 

code point or code points in the registry.  

The only difference is instructions for the review. 

 

Please read this draft and consider if the changes for the 

BGP-LS review will speed up the BGP-LS parameter assignments.  

 

John and I anticipate that expert reviews will allow code request for 

BGP-LS quicker response to code requests.  We encourage the WG to 

read and strongly consider this draft. 

 

Cheers, Sue