[Idr] comments of draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata
Cheng Li <c.l@huawei.com> Mon, 17 June 2024 15:28 UTC
Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F2BC15199A; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x6vW4dgWAgEC; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23BFDC151998; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4W2tvM0M94z67f4J; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:23:43 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.161.198]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1193F140136; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:28:36 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemf200007.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.2) by lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:28:35 +0100
Received: from dggpemf500009.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.50) by dggpemf200007.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:28:33 +0800
Received: from dggpemf500009.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.50]) by dggpemf500009.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.50]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:28:33 +0800
From: Cheng Li <c.l@huawei.com>
To: "draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: comments of draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata
Thread-Index: AdrAypgS46dfBq5UR1CXSBby8VH+7A==
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:28:32 +0000
Message-ID: <a38aadd8b97a459e9880722bc2afdc78@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.203.70.229]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_a38aadd8b97a459e9880722bc2afdc78huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: TPPY5CR7MFCIPNH33KV6I6RXFJYOKDO7
X-Message-ID-Hash: TPPY5CR7MFCIPNH33KV6I6RXFJYOKDO7
X-MailFrom: c.l@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] comments of draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/G4SCn-89oXkXWmcBRXrz6eKn18Y>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Authors, When I reread the draft, I find out that we can make some enhancements of the drafts, especially about the part of service-oriented part. My comments are recorded here: 1. https://github.com/ietf-wg-idr/draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata-14/issues/23 2. https://github.com/ietf-wg-idr/draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata-14/issues/24 Thoughts? Thanks, Cheng