Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-gredler-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 31 October 2016 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7668129B2E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GipiokFpG49L for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E91C129B30 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1778; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1477949132; x=1479158732; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=VlMwYFSNB5zOrRb6ztuG8VDozYpMLkZNELvgyI2YjbU=; b=G2Z6BsrzL37Po50E+im68hTvb7SIV7Lm3ke8G61GX3lzVKlEoGfcyWrr hKV9v8taSApGyyBJoDUtHbP/L3Czt6eE+ZRAy8Tvj3A36dR0TWvjzAkag UMiEhJ+doS1Ivdh/KrPEP/btEN5xFBU8T47gTnWnMpO3qk6r0fZv6q6ov A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CDAQCKtRdY/40NJK1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgyoBAQEBAR9YfQeNL6s9ggcdDYV5AhqBeD8UAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEYwEBBAEBARoGETobAgEIGgImAgICJQsVEAIEARKIVA6nDox0AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYEHiguHS4JcBZoYAYk3hniBboRtiSmREgEeNmCDV4E7cgGGf4EJAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,428,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="168116401"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 31 Oct 2016 21:25:31 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9VLPV8j019473 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 21:25:31 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:25:31 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:25:30 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-gredler-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext
Thread-Index: AQHSM7wV1TqPR23630ygLO2mNzOdyaDDExwA
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 21:25:30 +0000
Message-ID: <D43D2EBC.86A75%acee@cisco.com>
References: <BB8878B2-97E1-4B9A-B2CB-2AAA670AFB7C@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB8878B2-97E1-4B9A-B2CB-2AAA670AFB7C@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.197]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E8B7862C86A85741A520BB7B8A6DFC6F@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/GFnd8tI3VWiXwmiYm-QMXk598m4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-gredler-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 21:25:33 -0000

As a contributor, I support WG adoption. I have reviewed several versions
of the document and will be reviewing subsequent versions.
Thanks,
Acee 

On 10/31/16, 5:16 PM, "Idr on behalf of John G. Scudder"
<idr-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of jgs@juniper.net> wrote:

>Hi Everyone,
>
>The authors have asked (some time ago actually) for the WG to adopt
>draft-gredler-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext.
>
>If you support or oppose adoption please reply indicating so. Reasons for
>your position are helpful, as volunteering to review, comment, and/or
>shepherd.
>
>The adoption call will end November 13.
>
>Thanks,
>
>--John
>
>P.S.: 
>https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-gredler-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-04.tx
>t
>
>Abstract
>
>   Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end
>   paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of
>   topological sub-paths, called "segments".  These segments are
>   advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS, OSPF and
>   OSPFv3).
>
>   This draft defines extensions to the BGP Link-state address-family in
>   order to carry segment information via BGP.
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>Idr@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr