[Idr] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-25: (with COMMENT)

[Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-25: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work on this document. I have a couple of very minor comments
below, and a non blocking question: it seems to me that this document could
have contained the "updates" header wrt RFC 4456. Was this considered by the
working group?

Francesca

1. -----

FP: Please expand AS, POP, SPF, IBGP on first use.

2. -----

   The core of this solution is the ability for an operator to specify

FP: I would suggest adding the name and abbreviation BGP ORR here, otherwise it
comes as a surprise in section 4.