Re: [Idr] Document shepherd review for draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Fri, 27 August 2021 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905883A15DA; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 13:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WE1sM0v3HaeW; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 13:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23443A15D7; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 13:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BAC7B1E27C; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:23:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:23:45 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210827202345.GK19054@pfrc.org>
References: <20210827200116.GJ19054@pfrc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210827200116.GJ19054@pfrc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/GTXhFg9K3IBhtCTsefoZOUTqkOk>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Document shepherd review for draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 20:23:53 -0000

Correcting some mistakes in my write-up:

The sections below are in Section 6, IANA Considerations, so this is the
location where the request for the registries are being made.

My audit was to check vs. the existing IANA registry where I noted their
absence.

-- Jeff

On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 04:01:16PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> 2032	6.1.4.  BGP-LS Node Flags Registry
> 
> 2034	   The "BGP-LS Node Flags" registry is requested to be created for the
> 2035	   one-octet sized flags field of the Node Flag Bits TLV (1024) and
> 2036	   populated with the initial values shown below:
> 
> 2038	              Bit   Description             Reference
> 2039	              -----------------------------------------------
> 2040	               0    Overload Bit (O-bit)    [This document]
> 2041	               1    Attached Bit (A-bit)    [This document]
> 2042	               2    External Bit (E-bit)    [This document]
> 2043	               3    ABR Bit (B-bit)         [This document]
> 2044	               4    Router Bit (R-bit)      [This document]
> 2045	               5    V6 Bit (V-bit)          [This document]
> 2046	               6-7  Unassigned
> 
> 2048	   Allocations within the registry under the "RFC Required" policy (see
> 2049	   [RFC8126]).
> 
> This registry is absent from the IANA Considerations.  Similarly, IANA does not
> have a registry in the expected place:
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-ls-parameters/bgp-ls-parameters.xhtml
> 
> 2051	6.1.5.  BGP-LS MPLS Protocol Mask Registry
> 
> 2053	   The "BGP-LS MPLS Protocol Mask" registry is requested to be created
> 2054	   for the one-octet sized flags field of the MPLS Protocol Mask TLV
> 2055	   (1094) and populated with the initial values shown below:
> 
> 2057	    Bit   Description                                Reference
> 2058	    ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2059	     0    Label Distribution Protocol (L-bit)        [This document]
> 2060	     1    Extension to RSVP for LSP Tunnels (R-bit)  [This document]
> 2061	     2-7  Unassigned
> 
> 2063	   Allocations within the registry under the "RFC Required" policy (see
> 2064	   [RFC8126]).
> 
> See prior comment about missing IANA Considerations and registry at IANA.
> 
> 2066	6.1.6.  BGP-LS IGP Prefix Flags Registry
> 
> 2068	   The "BGP-LS IGP Prefix Flags" registry is requested to be created for
> 2069	   the 1 octet sized flags field of the IGP Flags TLV (1152) and
> 2070	   populated with the initial values shown below:
> 
> 2072	        Bit   Description                        Reference
> 2073	        ----------------------------------------------------------
> 2074	         0    IS-IS Up/Down Bit (D-bit)          [This document]
> 2075	         1    OSPF "no unicast" Bit (N-bit)      [This document]
> 2076	         2    OSPF "local address" Bit (L-bit)   [This document]
> 2077	         3    OSPF "propagate NSSA" Bit (P-bit)  [This document]
> 2078	         4-7  Unassigned
> 
> 2080	   Allocations within the registry under the "RFC Required" policy (see
> 2081	   [RFC8126]).
> 
> See prior comment about missing IANA Considerations and registry at IANA.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr