IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis (7/9/2021 to 7/25/2021) - Exended to 7/31/2021

Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 23 July 2021 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F223A11D9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C6Q_VaOy2d7B for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE5A33A11D5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id hg12-20020a17090b300cb02901736d9d2218so4931553pjb.1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=RBo6mdEWsV21FN4vyg/qz0GpbGSRo+87FNjh2LW1i2c=; b=OY3VnthMmw3rW5JGHPM2qQQP4caGPcEw6rXkIHkRRhqUmhNMZJklYCnH/uvRttfzZC F+LYFC2/wIIHJMHR00rLn9Kr7+JmZwt4Ln3hTyRhek6ZWymRX4tZToihVmy9KdWU1DKN c3qn6nieebS2SkYJ5t7gnDKZGP18jvIX08dFi+/lqjb3kzAhodIYQUk8dzyrzM76II7p UCUdxRPMWjWf57mj8iTOHs2innGiPFE2o0jIOwVNwvaqPLjtQW/flC7EexJkCb8BbvRx 521pSw3mgQevYQbKDAQSZOq60REvP0Tyn8dPd/i5VmbtOCVJWck0YV1XcGRZU90He/CG AGmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=RBo6mdEWsV21FN4vyg/qz0GpbGSRo+87FNjh2LW1i2c=; b=rDtZi0j63LNqmHDS5cj5Soc95MqBI6+AUcv/5B0orRtZQvXHAu6JeMbwTx63Eg8g9n u6H5nWoah06xuwsegussZ+kBUDDZ05mI93bIa4ktzGVX3Bs/sVbGvjfymih5cg2IGwqX Kq4WCB/DIcqpAuEaT0o7rUPZkRWuVZVtT61nktalHsuV5rR9RycXabyl3flbUpWoN4mc W+FlwdpovVPCI09pAe79EBNA7g0sl8AoP+O/IfG1K7ry23OLUf8aYnr7FZJAfje5tceJ Qw43JiDf3f5BRbpulfhnQCF/p4t9n/qOG1R6LLhCr30vlwGCn4rksP7rMe2XlLJ0AAOS RMQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530nqi001eJN77gnPY3OCwU6XwSLlT4gBPAgzuKYRdD76yefvrsP Xfh8UtRVJ3YMBis2/5k8OXTfY/h7pTU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJwoTajeoFDmEIauzMpRsjcN0J1/YuHvw3imQftA7Ath7aIoqb2N35oTYBVM6++iRBkdh3xA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:3013:b029:12b:6538:e1fb with SMTP id o19-20020a1709033013b029012b6538e1fbmr4692836pla.74.1627064875974; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (108-221-21-153.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.221.21.153]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p3sm38581366pgi.20.2021.07.23.11.27.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-D9AE1ACF-462F-42EE-A167-7A0F756D3063"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:27:54 -0700
Message-Id: <F8DAA1BB-1AB7-4DF0-9F95-2F58F455506D@gmail.com>
References: <025d01d77fe8$cb93f2d0$62bbd870$@ndzh.com>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <025d01d77fe8$cb93f2d0$62bbd870$@ndzh.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18F72)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/GV1UgGw3SbCYMtYXHLS4KCAJ-Q4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis (7/9/2021 to 7/25/2021) - Exended to 7/31/2021
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 18:28:02 -0000

Support

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:33 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> We have not received enough responses
> The WG LC for RFC7752bis.  The WG LC is extended to 7/31/2021.
>  
> Cheers, Sue  
>  
> From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 4:36 PM
> To: idr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis (7/9/2021 to 7/25/2021)
>  
> 3 implementations exist that are aligned to the RFC7752bis:
>  
> See the implementation report at:
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-RFC7752bis%20implementations%20
>  
> Sue
>  
> From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 4:29 PM
> To: idr@ietf.org
> Subject: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis (7/9/2021 to 7/25/2021)
>  
> This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis-07.txt.
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis/)
>  
> This draft is a revision of the RFC7752 on the Distribution of Link-State and Traffic Engineering Information Using BGP (BGP-LS) based on experience over the last 12 years since the 2009 publication of the RFC.  
>  
> There is a 3rd party IPR statement on this draft.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3623/
>  
> In your comments, please consider:
> 1.  Is this draft ready for publication?  
> 2. Does this represent the status of deployed implementations?
> 3. Are there any critical corrections to RFC7752 which have been left out?
> 4. What extensions should be left to future BGP-LS drafts?
>  
> This draft is being shepherded by all 3 IDR chairs. 
>  
> Cheerily, Sue
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email