Re: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-17.txt [3/25/2021 to 4/1/2021]
"Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com> Wed, 07 April 2021 05:28 UTC
Return-Path: <ketant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF9C3A4033; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 22:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=XqONSUqX; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=NtBIIIOJ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G8H5izKEpHvI; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 22:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3C323A4031; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 22:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=58788; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1617773332; x=1618982932; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=PBEEw7Wn7Xps7I694/So93n5v+JkEoXhPMKgrlqeGvo=; b=XqONSUqXRQNbGOI6pI1rHncYeoI3iIfoTrxiLuIeBtV0jm38eAV1I/Mu xi0rXMmVtuEOBaZ1/wUFgF04RfO12/NocQYXsbO2uW5aOs7D+A3DBUzCP FnykzBAa6QgzVnRbr04ySiItAwXeP/kSBZP3C9e4tTo3eggh/ZvVjTtsH U=;
X-IPAS-Result: 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
IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:/qbNVBy5MGDUO2PXCzMtngc9DhMPsqjoPgMT9pssgq5PdaLm5Zn5I UjD/p1Fh17SVoKd4PVB2KLasKHlDGoH55vJ8HUPa4dFWBJNj8IK1xchD8iIBQyeTrbqYiU2E d4EWApj+He2YkNUA835IVbVpy764TsbAB6qMw1zK6z8EZLTiMLi0ee09tXTbgxEiSD7b6l1K UC9rB7asY8dho4xQps=
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:ilCIOKhlvLtXx0/huu/7MdXREXBQX4hx3DAbvn1ZSRFFG/Gwv/ uF2NwGyB75jysQUnk8mdaGfJKNW2/Y6IQd2+gsFJ+Ydk3DtHGzJI9vqbHjzTrpBjHk+odmu5 tIW5NVTOf9BV0St6nHySGzGdo43Z2j+Kenme/Rwx5WPH5XQotLhj0JbTqzOEtwWQVAGN4dHJ 2T+sJIq1ObCAoqR+68AWQIWPWGms3TmPvdEFA7LjMEyC3LtzOn77bmDwOVty1/bxpjyaovmF K16DDRyb6kt5iAu3rh/k/Vq69bgd7wjuZEbfb89vQ9DhXJpkKWaJ96W7uE1QpF4d2HzFoxit HDr1MBEq1ImgnsV1q4qxfsxAXsuQxGgxSJpDPo4gqAneXDSD03EMZHj45CGyGplnYIhs1206 5AwguixvxqJC7Ahyj06pzpUBxnhyOP0AIfuNMTlHBWXM8ibqZQp+UkjTpoOaoHdRiKjLwPIa 1LNoXx9fxWeVSVYzTypW902uGhWXw1A1OvXlUCktb96UkXoFlJi28jgOAPlHYJ85wwD7Ne4f 7fD6hunLZSCucLcKNGAvsbS8ffMB2PfTv8dEapZXj3HqAOPHzA77Tt5q8u2e2scJsUiLw/hY rGS1EdkWIpYUrhBYmv0fRwg1LwaVT4eQ6o5tBV5pB/tLG5bqHsKze/RFcnlNblrO4YBsHdRv avKJNbC/LuNgLVaMJ09jy7f6MXBWgVUcUTtNp+cUmJuNj3JorjsfGecPu7HsurLR8UHkfERl cTVjn6I8tNqmqxXGXjvRTXU3TxPkj2/Zd6FrnG7/EeobJ9cLFkg0wwsxCU98uLITpNvugdZ0 1lOo7qlau9uC2x5mbH72JgPxJHFUZL6LD8U3dHzDV6dn/cQPImgZGyaGpS1HyIKltUVMXNCj NSoFxx5OaqNZCK3DsjDNimK2qeiHMWqBuxPs4hs5zGwf2gVoIzD54gVqA0KB7CEAZtnx127E 1ZbhUfe0PZHjTyqKmsgZAOHtvDf91kjArDG78NlVvv8WGn4eAmXD8yQiOnW8//u3deexNkwn lKt5I5rJXFszC1Mmc7iPk/KzR3GRSqKYMDKh+EaoVSkq3sYydqQw6x9GenoiB2XHb2/EMPgW GkCiuYdZjwcwdgk0Ed9Lr2+1VpcWjYRWZMUzRRtI1wEnmugAco7caCerez32yNalEL3+EaN3 XfbSEPJx51rurHpyK9iXKME24ryY4pOfGYBLM/c6vL0nfoM4GQk7oadsUksKpNJZTrsuURV/ iYdBLQJDTkC/kx0wj9nAduBABk7H0lm+jvwhvr8Syx22M+G+PbJBBjS6sAK9+Rq2jiSPDg6u Q1sfsl+e+xOH72cNiI1OXeaCNCMArapSquVP4zwKok9J4apf92Bd3WQDHI3HZI0FE3K9r1jl oXROB+7KraMoFicsQOc0tijxUUvcXKKFFuvh39A+c4c11olXPdMt+T67fDqLYkACS61UDNEE ja9zcY8+bOXiOF27JfFrk5Jn5OblMgrHtl5+GPeuTreXOXXvAG+ED/NHCzcLVQEvfYXboRqw t3+NGOkauccTHi1AXZoDt8JeZP/g+cMLePKRPJHfQN9dqwfUmIiO+t5sW4iT/sUzu1a0gCn+ R+BAQtR9UGjiNnlZE91yi5V7f+rU0kmUZP+D0PrC+Z5qG2pGPAWVxcOQLXgp9KTSBeP3iBg8 PC6/WZ3h3GkU948IiGElxRcNFIE8URSYayLz4GE7ljgIKV
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,201,1613433600"; d="scan'208,217";a="693368398"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 07 Apr 2021 05:28:51 +0000
Received: from mail.cisco.com (xbe-rcd-007.cisco.com [173.37.102.22]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1375SpmP016439 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 05:28:51 GMT
Received: from xfe-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.250) by xbe-rcd-007.cisco.com (173.37.102.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 00:28:51 -0500
Received: from xfe-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.249) by xfe-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.250) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 00:28:50 -0500
Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xfe-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.249) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 00:28:50 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=MYe9X1SdkDgD4gK+cS5KiAkU7uEfRtcNHzFS0uOaEC1DkiEbECVrWntQCftVZmhr6wR2HDz/HpbTlU4OysL5CjnY67+b5wdJY8qOmuurWOUQwt6d902H4sOuRKdQfeLtfRWYwVO+46mQAsdgrnFy4zfrALTsID7mVIeSCUxq7rsrWFgR8QxUJj9ddHmmSKfyIS7zWARNsnNaFxKLiBmtZKNz1yQ9ljOCpMm1zu3RPxMKApeqzmEM7LGvH6rgGH6g/wAkt8yBHvzK6zfumQ8fE/Dt9wTOoeUC4ut5MEiuF27HOs2DbdCutuAO53Imens4OH3QcwH7cTCr6St8ZAdcZw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=PBEEw7Wn7Xps7I694/So93n5v+JkEoXhPMKgrlqeGvo=; b=j8b1rAIWI+Vv3LUwW/UtNVGLEAUBxj3iEww8Al5wYt58dRvFW3QpDNEQ84pjaF2PCMcFEDyZlBIDcca+0XU1uUAHb0hek0f+LXGWhXlMqMkoXhcQEHP2H2+2vnAvac0kuxALWEc/ok+9L8Nkj/QDLMeOqaNihcDkSE9Ly935ZdacRO81krel+0s7pKte/sF7vOjlEAQZletPHhX55/lxd44tQb1JhRTHCkKAnXvHWps4q+UwrOwOkNTDFZdK5gcrh3xxG7L65SLClg+TBe20iB170JfW+D4FTBneVgzTY/ljjhmgbueWQ+MPbum/Hm1hq2daEMbcqaMiqEVcnrItyg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=PBEEw7Wn7Xps7I694/So93n5v+JkEoXhPMKgrlqeGvo=; b=NtBIIIOJqwqF8f31kJXtepTjr6BEOOMI6bA5zvI3Lujp5tZTW8JUXjIMdPuXoXJlEVn7WYyULq7W+khNWJ+P+6lb4NL4pcUHYNzFltb7BheOIOOOM6cAd1pzyD1V3AYx+PhmKHtdZLrvOKRCW8E2Uu1R77Cf0KJ3Y/2ZYnlX35M=
Received: from MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:5f::22) by MWHPR11MB0032.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:63::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3999.28; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 05:28:48 +0000
Received: from MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::592f:2e19:cf5b:a0f5]) by MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::592f:2e19:cf5b:a0f5%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3999.033; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 05:28:48 +0000
From: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-17.txt [3/25/2021 to 4/1/2021]
Thread-Index: AdchgybxP+OFoYtEQQSLI53Do8kgxgJeYNiAAANoJiAAAEmBgAAAO+ZAAACOCvAAF//boA==
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 05:28:48 +0000
Message-ID: <MW3PR11MB4570EAD9019E0D25EDCC962CC1759@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <010e01d72184$4dd84de0$e988e9a0$@ndzh.com> <MW3PR11MB45704C74F8391FC7172B01F5C1769@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BY5PR11MB433720FDB48ADC7B17214C11C1769@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsx4ujt5dox+PjPOOLn2vGgEnMn_aVp6vD3p0WxD3=Nrvg@mail.gmail.com> <MW3PR11MB4570E9F3389CCFBA80D403F7C1769@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BY5PR11MB433765E58C7EAF51F1A8F9F2C1769@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB433765E58C7EAF51F1A8F9F2C1769@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [72.163.220.12]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 241260ed-8dd6-4c58-c5bb-08d8f98605a1
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR11MB0032:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR11MB00321DDEC4ABFF76FF109FF2C1759@MWHPR11MB0032.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(376002)(346002)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(66556008)(6506007)(64756008)(5660300002)(166002)(52536014)(53546011)(66446008)(2906002)(4326008)(9686003)(71200400001)(55016002)(66574015)(83380400001)(38100700001)(186003)(8676002)(9326002)(8936002)(316002)(33656002)(86362001)(110136005)(76116006)(966005)(66946007)(7696005)(478600001)(26005)(66476007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MW3PR11MB4570EAD9019E0D25EDCC962CC1759MW3PR11MB4570namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 241260ed-8dd6-4c58-c5bb-08d8f98605a1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Apr 2021 05:28:48.7928 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: u0sxjln/LjP6DOJRo9Nd2aO29zLgyyG4rV9yuDDYEzZw609Vh4ZaSSsTd8JqfCDD4N6hjrZH1EF9Bh6nvtrpBg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR11MB0032
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.22, xbe-rcd-007.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/GkIUdGShUetc8BF-k9Hztbk_gPM>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-17.txt [3/25/2021 to 4/1/2021]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 05:28:58 -0000
Hi Les, Thanks for your confirmation and your proposed text looks better as well. Let us also wait to hear feedback from Alvaro, IDR chairs and others in the WG. Thanks, Ketan From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com> Sent: 07 April 2021 01:05 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant@cisco.com>; Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>; Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>; idr@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-17.txt [3/25/2021 to 4/1/2021] Ketan/Alvaro – Looking at this again, I can see why some text is necessary. Here is an alternate suggestion: IS-IS flags correspond to the IPv4/IPv6 Extended Reachability Attribute Flags defined in section 2.1 of [RFC7794]. In the case of the X-flag when associated with IPv6 prefix reachability the setting corresponds to the setting of the X-flag in the fixed format of IS-IS TLVs 236 [RFC5308] and 237 [RFC5120]. I believe this deserves to be more than a “Note” because RFC 7794 requires X-flag in Prefix Reachability sub-TLV in such cases to be sent as 0 and ignored on receipt – which means you cannot derive the X-flag from Prefix Attributes sub-TLV, but you still want to use the bit position of the X-flag in Prefix Attributes sub-TLV for the value derived from the IPv6 Prefix Reachability TLVs. Les From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant@cisco.com<mailto:ketant@cisco.com>> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2021 10:51 AM To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com>>; Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com<mailto:ginsberg@cisco.com>>; idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-17.txt [3/25/2021 to 4/1/2021] Hi Alvaro/Les, The RFC7794 covers the ISIS protocol handling of the X-flag from either the IPv4/IPv6 Extended Reachability Attribute Flags sub-TLV or from the fixed form TLVs 236 & 237. The BGP-LS draft currently says that the contents of the BGP-LS Prefix Attribute Flags TLV is derived from the IPv4/IPv6 Extended Reachability Attribute Flags sub-TLV in case of ISIS. It does not cover this “special” handling that is required for the X-flag in TLV 236/237 and populating that info into BGP-LS. This is the clarification that I was referring to and I did not see that as a duplication. I am OK in skipping this text update if you still believe it to be unnecessary. Thanks, Ketan From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com>> Sent: 06 April 2021 23:07 To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com<mailto:ginsberg@cisco.com>>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant@cisco.com<mailto:ketant@cisco.com>>; idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-17.txt [3/25/2021 to 4/1/2021] Les: Hi! The text is not normative…but I do see your point about duplication. I’m fine with not adding the note. Thanks! Alvaro. On April 6, 2021 at 1:32:49 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) (ginsberg=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:ginsberg=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>) wrote: Ketan – I always prefer NOT to duplicate normative statements found in referenced documents as there are only two possibilities – neither of which is useful: 1)You will get it right – in which case the text will be redundant 2)You will get it wrong – in which case the text will introduce ambiguity You have referenced RFC 7794 – I think that should be all that is required. No change please. Les From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2021 9:09 AM To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>; idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-17.txt [3/25/2021 to 4/1/2021] Hello All, A minor point (IMHO worth clarification) related to this draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext has come to my notice out of the ongoing AD-review and discussion [1] for the draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions. This is related to the Prefix Attribute Flags TLV : https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-17#section-2.3.2 Currently the draft says that for IS-IS they are derived from the IPv4/IPv6 Extended Reachability Attribute Flags sub-TLV as specified in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7794#section-2.1 What we missed (though it is described in RFC7794 sec 2.1), is that for the X-flag, the value needs to be picked from the IS-IS TLVs 236 and 237. The proposed changes are in sec 2.3.2 as follows: <OLD/> * IS-IS flags correspond to the IPv4/IPv6 Extended Reachability Attribute Flags defined in section 2.1 of [RFC7794]<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7794#section-2.1> </OLD> <NEW/> * IS-IS flags correspond to the IPv4/IPv6 Extended Reachability Attribute Flags defined in section 2.1 of [RFC7794]. Note: for the prefix reachability advertisement via IS-IS TLVs 236 [RFC5308] and 237 [RFC5120], the value of the X-flag to be set in the BGP-LS TLV is determined from the fixed format of those IS-IS TLVs instead of the IS-IS IPv4/IPv6 Extended Reachability Attributes Flags sub-TLV. </NEW> I wanted to check with WG/chairs/AD if this is something that we ought to fix/update at this stage in the draft. Thanks, Ketan [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/HAtgICjP4qB23LKfbyZQigDeQSo/ -----Original Message----- From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: 25 March 2021 20:07 To: idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org> Subject: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-17.txt [3/25/2021 to 4/1/2021] IDR: This is a 1 Week WG call for comments the changes to draft-ietf-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-17.txt. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-17 The comments on this document are only for the changes from -16 to -17.txt Ketan summarized the changes in his early message with "This update to the BGP-LS SR draft (that was sitting in the RFC-editor Q due to misref) was required to the recent changes in the https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator- 09 that was the missing reference as part of the AD review. It updates the references to the Source Router Identifier TLV for OSPF and introduces a new TLV for the Source OSPF Router-ID TLV to cover the new TLV introduced by draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator." It is a fine summary of the changes. Please send comments if you are concerned about the changes. Unless comments are heard, the intent is to allow the RFC editor to publish based on the -17.txt version. Cheers, Susan Hares _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr@ietf.org<mailto:Idr@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr@ietf.org<mailto:Idr@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-ietf-… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-i… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-i… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-i… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-i… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-i… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-i… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-i… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [Idr] 1 Week last call on changes to: draft-i… Alvaro Retana