IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call draft-ymbk-idr-bgp-open-policy - (6/6 to 6/20/2016)

Marco Marzetti <marco@lamehost.it> Fri, 10 June 2016 16:33 UTC

Return-Path: <marco@lamehost.it>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D149D12D845; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.327
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UzQ6wzIpDtQ4; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from seele.lamehost.it (seele.lamehost.it [80.76.80.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AE712D820; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by seele.lamehost.it (Postfix, from userid 33) id 1915274387; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 18:33:25 +0200 (CEST)
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 18:33:25 +0200
From: Marco Marzetti <marco@lamehost.it>
In-Reply-To: <012e01d1c012$1d05f8d0$5711ea70$@ndzh.com>
References: <012e01d1c012$1d05f8d0$5711ea70$@ndzh.com>
Message-ID: <d59a7ac3f0de6d1170123f2ccd0d017d@lamehost.it>
X-Sender: marco@lamehost.it
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.5
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/GqTXnhhOwtq950PF4nmWqIxoa3E>
Cc: idr@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation@ietf.org, "'John G. Scudder'" <jgs@bgp.nu>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call draft-ymbk-idr-bgp-open-policy - (6/6 to 6/20/2016)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:33:29 -0000

On 2016-06-06 18:40, Susan Hares wrote:

Dear members,

> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for
> draft-ymbk-idr-bgp-open-policy. You can find the draft at:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ymbk-idr-bgp-open-policy/.
> 
> In your comments on adopting this draft, please indicate:
> 
> 1)      "Support" or "no Support"

I do not support this draft

> 
> 2)      Do you feel this is a way to prevent route leaks?
> 

Only in a perfect world.

> 3)      Are there any deployment issues that might prevent deployment

This approach is too strict and can't cope with the different peering 
relationships that exist in the real world.
(In other words: you can't bound your sales to these specs)

> of this enhancement to BGP Open?
> 
> 4)      Does this interact with
> draft-ietf-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation?

Partly.
They try to address the same problem in very different ways.

> 
> Sue Hares and John Scudder
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

Regards

-- 
Marco

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email