Re: [Idr] [GROW] Choice of Large vs. Extended Community for Route Leaks Solution

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Thu, 01 April 2021 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDE43A1671; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 07:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hg61fK0K676d; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 07:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356B93A166C; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 07:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6ECED1E44B; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:11:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:11:43 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: Interminable Discussion Room <idr@ietf.org>, GMO Crops <grow@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20210401151143.GO24667@pfrc.org>
References: <SA1PR09MB814269138AEE1567CEED703B847C9@SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <20210331161358.GI24667@pfrc.org> <SA1PR09MB8142C40CC942F7CF7BD05EDF847C9@SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <20210331220942.GL24667@pfrc.org> <m235walxbl.wl-randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m235walxbl.wl-randy@psg.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/GwzcNkC1eec0MtXLbggm-_gr1Mg>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [GROW] Choice of Large vs. Extended Community for Route Leaks Solution
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 14:49:43 -0000

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 04:26:06PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> > The point Jakob follows up with in this thread strongly suggests
> > communities are not a viable mechanism.
> 
> communities are rarely a viable mechanism.  too malleable, forgable,
> ...  once again, see our paper.

Randy adds elsewhere:

Florian Streibelt, Franziska Lichtblau, Robert Beverly, Anja Feldmann,
Cristel Pelsser, Georgios Smaragdakis, Randy Bush; BGP Communities: Even
more Worms in the Routing Can; ACM Internet Measurement Conference 2018
https://archive.psg.com/181101.imc-communities.pdf


-- Jeff