Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4360 (4944)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 23 February 2017 22:19 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFA7129B92 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:19:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hzAJGFNWGT9K for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:19:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99DD6129B50 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:19:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2078; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1487888361; x=1489097961; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=/zEPSxexHZBkowwU22zi2H3ADFNmy5IVo6c8XE2oagU=; b=alESYB+MFVGLiW3HX/PXpsaPZx3ROfIRQdYIRZ3mM1VU3DElBvErdg/M 7zyJlZD7MgMRp0gRXoazTqtmJHWMshSm3dGn2K06RENMpXURXONrfuLho QOCuCHwJkAYX7RwXC3wPRsJ1lb78LC+2dYQqL1wmcKeVoJSrTmyZzMjbW 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AMAgDHXq9Y/4sNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1BhgQkHg1SKCJFclTSCDR8LhXgcgws/GAECAQEBAQEBAWIohHE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQQBASEROgsSAQgYAgImAgQlCxUSBAENBYl1Dq4igiaLQwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEaBYELijCBPIMYgwaCXwWJI4d0in0BkiOBe48WiDeKcAEfOIEAVBU?= =?us-ascii?q?+hFiBcXUBijiBDQEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,198,1484006400"; d="scan'208";a="388890636"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 23 Feb 2017 22:19:20 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com (xch-rtp-001.cisco.com [64.101.220.141]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1NMJK8C003608 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:19:20 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:19:19 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:19:19 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4360 (4944)
Thread-Index: AQHSjiLgj6B6WbnDmk2Sy0n5XeEa0A==
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:19:19 +0000
Message-ID: <D4D4C920.9E6A0%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <91A649F48D581A4A8C02C7757515F7A1@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/H3FCun3ghBSJHGVt5mO30FSFGrg>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, "yang@nohdmi.com" <yang@nohdmi.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4360 (4944)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:19:25 -0000

Hi all, 

On 2/23/17, 5:11 PM, "Idr on behalf of Alvaro Retana (aretana)"
<idr-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of aretana@cisco.com> wrote:

>I Rejected it already. ☺
>
>Thanks!
>
>Alvaro.
>
>
>
>
>
>On 2/23/17, 4:50 PM, "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:
>
>    The erratum either is for a typographical error, in which case it
>should be Hold for Document Update, or it's in error, in which case it
>should 
>be Rejected. The guidelines don't offer a "this is a matter of taste"
>option, which I think is what applies here, unless someone can cite an
>RFC Editor style guideline specifying that the rulers are supposed to
>have the numbers above the pluses?
>    
>    Right now my inclination would be go with Reject, but if someone can
>cite evidence that the proposed fix is objectively more correct than the
>current text (or if the mood of the WG supports that option, for that
>matter) we could do Hold for Document Update instead.

I’m certainly not recommending that the ruler alignment justifies an
errata but, for future reference, the preferred ruler style is consistency
with RFC 791 with the numbers over the middle of the bit positions.

Refer to section 3.4 or
https://www.rfc-editor.org/old/instructions2authors.txt

This is something I typically will correct when I review a draft.

Thanks,
Acee



>    
>    
>
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>Idr@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr