Re: [Idr] AD review and progression of draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-03

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Wed, 18 February 2015 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFC21A0102 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:35:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D9pBjiAwB2bo for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:35:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x230.google.com (mail-ob0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E48E11A1B59 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id wo20so7989978obc.7 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:35:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uBkxJdBfUqRE2FX8/YWmzOfyUMFZBIpnfdri8jFt2AI=; b=Rd+7yugKeGRo8P+kic4DUdqqESn2/8VuO76efXr/pNeSczIJAiHEA6cQbjNYWstoNg rCXEPT+D1jaSPl+hNb/64sQFlDLo9nA8jXwsgXTfGIaFal1Jd5Q0F43kwR5JTYrbryM2 ETbcKwBiD3ecxKRcnpsqVCEW26jcf+LRniZbtshDA0NxdIZSZ6DqqtRbXEGmvTNWXSAo 3weVFdYxShL/i61L9jK1MglkX7svJ3E0WuqcabZ2wpL9IFKv1sdLjZJreQXZwVc8MUlh 438iMZkem0zXhFxJmh39aaR011pSlqASMsiPWCWcANCwoDP5CC9M8lkJc98XWCOeyS2Y Eu2g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.81.138 with SMTP id a10mr373757oby.57.1424298945264; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.94.20 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:35:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D0F944AD.42355%wesley.george@twcable.com>
References: <CAG4d1rcCHcogajQjWtLAd7gu-ZtNUGQaPDyRd14YEkh1K4C2KQ@mail.gmail.com> <D0F944AD.42355%wesley.george@twcable.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:35:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1reECyzk6zJ-P-S49cygKbae=mkDLMFkuq0OJPiHWK=ahg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b2e477aafc017050f6470c8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/HOjh0EW2x-G2mIO7C-O8xCxROvE>
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-as-migration@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-as-migration@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD review and progression of draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-03
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:35:48 -0000

Hi Wes,

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:06 PM, George, Wes <wesley.george@twcable.com>
wrote:

>  Alia – ack and thank you for the review. Since your comments are more
> minor on this draft than the SIDR one, I will wait to make those changes
> when I incorporate any other IETF last call comments.
>
>  re: "existing BGP security mechanisms" - I want to make sure that I'm
> including the specific things you had in mind. Are we just talking about
> BGP session authentication and/or GTSM, or is there something else that I'm
> forgetting?
>

Just those.
An updated version also addressing IESG comments would be good.


>  Thanks,
>
>
>
> Wes
>
>
>
>
>    From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, January 30, 2015 at 2:46 PM
> To: "draft-ietf-idr-as-migration@tools.ietf.org" <
> draft-ietf-idr-as-migration@tools.ietf.org>
> Cc: Idr <idr@ietf.org>
> Subject: AD review and progression of draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-03
> Resent-To: <samante@apple.com>, "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
>
>  I have done my standard AD review of this useful and clear draft.
>
>  First, I would recommend strengthening the security considerations
> with a reference to the existing BGP security mechanisms.
>
>  Second, based on a reading of RFC 3967 and how this draft uses the AS
> numbers for an example, I believe that the reference should be informative.
>
>  Please handle these issues during IETF Last Call.
>
>  I'm putting this into IETF Last Call and on the IESG telechat for Feb 19.
>
>  Thanks for the good work!
> Alia
>
> ------------------------------
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you
> are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that
> any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to
> the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and
> may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify
> the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of
> this E-mail and any printout.
>