Re: [Idr] [Re: Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-31.txt

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Tue, 02 July 2019 03:42 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1981201CC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 20:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bEhkicayWD5e for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 20:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 169371201D3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 20:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id d4so25800072edr.13 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 20:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OfsN6LuI5UIp/PpodbCssaZ9rBiK6HYIjB9xnPpbX9E=; b=VlHEm/+DvKyswnk/aNpSShtGZzLuR5sHix3YWn6S/4/EbvgLI7URR9pKjOMYfsXLp8 /ex/vGuuCvOm8063QbG4Obn1/Xnhl0b6oN49Q6jrmEZ834n9TPj01SLR0Pr1gcWFlqpf EfYLsdPdQ0fROLpUor0BjEvg/MVWF9MnnFxKqqLzl/Hc8oLpEwwu/S41Vxg/vYYKJyGc UrTv2lXSuO6w4FzEhwYqmWvQpeTy/JVeUmidwNTDPMyqfLITnRN1E9mVPPQOcZzjqDwB YVa8thLzV3u+ZfQ/B17pqFeuOP2jjhlC+VGtWX2vSy49j3CErrnum9uu94x6sLk+JFpY 0C/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OfsN6LuI5UIp/PpodbCssaZ9rBiK6HYIjB9xnPpbX9E=; b=RANUxsaAhDAxJqEbUyUjNYeQoENB7u+3LGVpuiwbnb3NFStgvfrJHd6vV9mZPloySa wM7ejItm5FLcROdKjbuuCiCHMEwzyUfIAsvWg46a5RblyOre3qpRq46GOP1XFGcFtZ1o gUCY/1QdKyvvQ7B/Y/qoRGje+TOA6f4xqxyLH+EN8ubGs67IBZV1evitOX74hRcgm58t q54UBFl+s1VgttVZmdbxVw4T0qU+RptPcGE6k5jDRv62D63/ZqVA31poqhlFEl5eCWGM ayf1Dp8TCLHf8CL8dHWOQPJDzYceKQRCYN96sw8nKFRBllEVjlIjSC0WUiwete3WF/LK gDqA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUIzati/FaT2ye1CUbziDaUfmbZya9aAgfzDXARq1gLbMokxtdk B04v6LM9kF2uneRUYj+w/zpblWNUGCW9YdotWmE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyJC84pQKtVjfCq+V70A5fct5Cjf41C/Yws8eGRiR+BnPdEgEi5MvVJNbVorCC3anP+ShTLnGGIePvWDhzWOiU=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:94d9:: with SMTP id t25mr33076022eda.32.1562038953704; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 20:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <FDAC847D-60A2-4571-99CF-50458AC0E159@cisco.com> <m21rz9xn46.wl-randy@psg.com> <CAL9jLaayGk7HuAepuy=fzoRv+HHOUQJSgauRkjBCPxgtXzGN3g@mail.gmail.com> <3E08630E-03F7-41F1-95C4-0007EBFBCC95@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3E08630E-03F7-41F1-95C4-0007EBFBCC95@cisco.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 20:41:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hMiLFO-UrVPXXihjjZmg0mS1L8zc_d5yrNxF_-fs5QHWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Enke Chen (enkechen)" <enkechen@cisco.com>
Cc: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f6032a058caa88a0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/HVdA_TWnwgcxeCId-3vw33CSimg>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Re: Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-31.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 03:42:37 -0000

+1 to Enke's opinion from what has been done on other options, don't make
spec tighter than needed unless a specific issue that mandates
bi-directionality can be presented.

--- tony


On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 8:35 PM Enke Chen (enkechen) <enkechen@cisco.com>
wrote:

> No, there is no such assumption.  Perhaps let me rephrase for clarify:
>
> As long as Speaker A  is able and willing to receive large messages (by
> advertising
> the capability), its neighbor would be allowed to send such messages to
> Speaker A.
> Such behavior does not depend on whether Speaker A  is able / willing /
> need to
> send any large messages to its neighbors.
>
> Regards,  -- Enke
>
> On 7/1/19, 7:01 PM, "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     (from enke)
>     > > IMO the capability should be about “receiving” only. As long as a
> BGP
>     > > speaker is able and willing to receive large messages (by
> advertising
>     > > the capability), its neighbor would be allowed to send such
> messages
>     > > to the speaker. It really does not matter whether the speaker is
> able
>     > > / willing / need to send any large messages to its
>
>     is it a good idea to assume that you can send just because you can
> receive?
>     assuming seems a little dicey.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>