Message-ID: <39469E08BD83D411A3D900204840EC55BC2DA9@vie-msgusr-01.dc.fore.com>
From: "Abarbanel, Benjamin" <Benjamin.Abarbanel@Marconi.com>
To: "'Jeffrey Haas'" <jhaas@nexthop.com>,
 "Abarbanel, Benjamin" <Benjamin.Abarbanel@Marconi.com>
Cc: idr@merit.edu
Subject: RE: IDR WG charter
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:46:59 -0400 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk

Jeff:
  I see no discussion on this list of the work to complete the base spec
other than
the review and update of Sue's FSM spec. So unless, all this effort is done
in a
private list or behind the scenes, I dont see how it is detracted by new
work topics
discussed here?

Ben

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Haas [mailto:jhaas@nexthop.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:56 AM
> To: Abarbanel, Benjamin
> Cc: idr@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: IDR WG charter
> 
> 
> Ben,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:39:52PM -0400, Abarbanel, Benjamin wrote:
> > At the rate things get done it will be 1-2 years before the 
> old work is
> > completed
> > (makes it to RFC status), where does that put us with new 
> fresh ideas?
> 
> It shouldn't take that long.  The amount of effort the working group
> has expended on debating new drafts would probably have pushed us
> to a final draft on bgp if we had used the same effort.
> 
> > Ben
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Haas 
> NextHop Technologies
>