Re: [Idr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-08: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9262128CFF; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x3E2oZySYwpi; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489931289B0; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id p73so84652863ywp.0; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4BiNQ7mv5NOGDEdIVuAeXUNNbN+hZSzT7vvJdXeDCgc=; b=bo5PmMrbzZr3ZKIpTEVV7iGKC+rvpNR9yKaB/dF8ibvthEWVuNu1xl3bYz5EZB8hdN 40z0/166xzej1vvSOebLeT+rvfsRTSS5/JLsRVYc1fbK3sGUG4O5bryBjv2+N31IbyuZ /v2V1JtNcqc53KwrIX3rQzbqB8qZR/6AIQkeZjDRsupV0gHi1BKUTmcry5BbESZ2vmc6 xkDVNi45eLCFHLCzKvjmAa4vcJ1LgVC4c9jzFdYxjmCVOhptYqy2JbBESZn9A0yZN9JW WATriUcGIhCUgyifZDE1HIF6YwMnsOw8Ap06TLQO0rAlYwlcd4W00tZX48Ops37A4Ri/ MAzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4BiNQ7mv5NOGDEdIVuAeXUNNbN+hZSzT7vvJdXeDCgc=; b=aLFSZCzialerWfZ+vgKTYHZIQj5Tu+LQkPPeBg1zGNuilDyy65DxzuqQuvfFVRvRl6 lF3ecNIO2VAjPU8HFm9A3RAVm5MawAr0vkWT9uuiziS1WQRAX6wYxCTtPorkEk133uaV M8zV3/W3DcZE1+DiA5LMXtYGL4VRytKVKqDLdOWqpzR5kLtgDSa6FAwJ/SOYDi7BV/cv haF1A30LbCeJ4NOZpfc3+zNf5rRks9zdWFfwgy0XP+jaYmJbibojzleP+JUMentqsIsl gUn8+Fq7/mnAM2JbWOEWvHDDoe3ITBp5QdYo82AG3kQzZc5AH+upplnB/tkqxTbnu/D6 cVJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBAR4A49K32B+DHfWrIA/M6tLaX3AMDEqC4gIMo9zjEf0dhaFoN FxMUQVzdZfWvbAb1jULFqemQbDF1Qw==
X-Received: by 10.13.254.68 with SMTP id o65mr32793435ywf.263.1495662563623; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.161.198 with HTTP; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170522154940.xmswso4hneaq6c25@hanna.meerval.net>
References: <149546547958.14094.10590846251303101931.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170522151124.dvc3ljpatp4cg5vs@hanna.meerval.net> <AB687B10-14F1-447D-89A3-8683DA9E49CE@kuehlewind.net> <20170522154940.xmswso4hneaq6c25@hanna.meerval.net>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 17:49:23 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-f3DJvMSC79i-2TaRuYouw6W_HL5cMqKrXA_=m09+ecbA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Cc: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, idr@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-shutdown@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, idr-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c081dcacf0f8a05504c138b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/IMIlqouleFrg8wmaOrXj0LohHgY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 21:49:26 -0000

Hi, Job,

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> wrote:

> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 05:15:53PM +0200, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:
> > Ah, thanks. Wasn’t aware of this. I’m neither a copyright expert.
>
> > Did you try to contact the authors of RFC4486 rather than adding this
> > note?
>
> No. Copy+pasting the note as suggested by the idnits tool seemed less
> work :-)


Having done the same thing, it's less work, THIS time.

The problem is that authors of older RFCs get closer to not being able to
respond to questions every year (many changed e-mail addresses, some
retired, and some, sadly, died), and if you don't check this now, every
time this draft gets a bis, you'll have to decide whether to go chase the
authors or keep cutting and pasting boilerplate that says, essentially,
"we're not actually sure we're allowed to use this text, because the
original authors were never asked the question".

As I understand things, of course.

Spencer, who has a draft in AD Evaluation with an author who has passed on
- his e-mail address still works, but that only irritates his family when
we ask questions like this one ...