Re: [Idr] draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension - 1 week period to comment (11/17 - 11/24/2016)
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 02 December 2016 09:24 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97AE129BB3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:24:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YqSElsnHOcRp for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:24:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26B321295A0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:24:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=70.194.10.116;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'Pushpasis Sarkar' <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <007501d24bbf$11a41b50$34ec51f0$@ndzh.com> <CAEFuwkjwNdQcj=C3JrKt8LTAXsP6Su4_S2Mss+CeCf3bDasqog@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEFuwkjwNdQcj=C3JrKt8LTAXsP6Su4_S2Mss+CeCf3bDasqog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 04:21:21 -0500
Message-ID: <001a01d24c7d$72367440$56a35cc0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001B_01D24C53.89610880"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQE7cm38Wxykn4lMS06FXtFzjOE1IQKg6Ys9og0OfOA=
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/IN58WWuuQGGtU2AmSPyShzZFML0>
Cc: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension - 1 week period to comment (11/17 - 11/24/2016)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 09:24:33 -0000
Pushpasis: If there exist 2 implementations for this draft, please let me know. We can go rapidly into the final stages before WG LC. Sue From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pushpasis Sarkar Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 1:57 PM To: Susan Hares Cc: idr wg Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension - 1 week period to comment (11/17 - 11/24/2016) Hi Sue, Thanks a lot. I have uploaded it as draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension. Best regards, -Pushpasis On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote: The IDR consensus is that the IPR on draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension is acceptable. The authors should submit the draft as: draft-ietf-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension. Sue Hares _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- [Idr] draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-ext… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag… Pushpasis Sarkar
- Re: [Idr] draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] draft-psarkar-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag… Pushpasis Sarkar