Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-13.txt (Extended until 7/30/2021)

Susan Hares <> Fri, 23 July 2021 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF123A14F5; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.348
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PBllbRDESUpD; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 12:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AF593A14F3; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 12:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 15:41:57 -0400
Message-ID: <02e501d77ffa$d29bdae0$77d390a0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02E6_01D77FD9.4B8C5DC0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Add/+pndI9OP97ANQQKHBWpVsk8nRA==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-13.txt (Extended until 7/30/2021)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 19:43:16 -0000

The 2 Week WG LC is extended until 7/30/2021. 


Please comment on the WG LC. 

We have only had 7 responses including authors. 

This level of comments is not enough to approve 

This draft. 


Thank you, Sue 


From: Idr [] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 1:27 PM
Subject: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for


This begins a 2 week WG LC for the



This draft has an IPR statement (see
so the IDR working group members should consider this in their review. 


This draft has 3 reported implementations (Cisco IOS-XR, Arista EOS, and
Juniper).  You can see the information reported at:


The draft describes a new BGP SAFI with a new NLRI for advertising a
candidate path of a Segment Routing Policy. 


In your comments consider if this draft is:  

a) ready for publication, 

b) benefits deployments of segment routing, 

c) uses the new sub-TLVs for tunnel encapsulation attribute in appropriate

d) adequately describes the new technology. 


Thank you, Susan Hares