Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-20

"Russ White" <7riw77@gmail.com> Tue, 07 March 2017 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <7riw77@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE8A126D74; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:06:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jkMcFO590cee; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x241.google.com (mail-qk0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D7D6128B38; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x241.google.com with SMTP id o135so1487364qke.2; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 07:06:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=L9UNe7aDU83Tp5KSkYJ5q0dUho1j0jrBqkSalXJUpA0=; b=JwxNo/EBi7TKOlL5rreQNAVDja+UEm4pFrOLylMmfKcYuAih46S31WEQimbmHL+e+l 7XuuQtAqHq8SQKv2Xt5yYdpaLVk5IVoDgYP+TMhHl9N1b8ULs1Asm7x12jXH6dsMBvsK CafNvL1THr/wgzArwgwxF+JUfbt1OvumqedStqosaQMahewZgqRZD8n6STYNzUZKBVnB Ro9EDL3bpUG2KYRbWY4JrTQSYWDCwH9SqSSNfd/WLp1bWIXL0haGUSY6HIY4GCMaIz7C xsUm5N7vPE96TAsiZhmBQjW0Ra0t+TbQAVx82CXTdBGbKeCrwDq30KMErZERsbwHNaL1 41bw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=L9UNe7aDU83Tp5KSkYJ5q0dUho1j0jrBqkSalXJUpA0=; b=DDWFiwhk5shkamGC6HCuxeUCjPosU6Fx5tXBw/rZMqwwybl1SVCvvrkdwW3SyW+D97 z12jFgDhJw6s3CxfqYw0jRA88F28FXkxvJPvNcCCfTbtFkUv42oNnYgEnv6HY6YpQ6fC n4/RPRorBq9nB7/btzlCJvwBWoXDJgsyoEBM2yNnxVKkf0V8wGBBuS7G4A0dWDeIOC3O 2/ISBx9tnNd4QiaZKMWAtrPREAYAuCGJWjB6KMhEG6JZWNEhdw34HlFKCDE574gB6GO8 jMqxk0W5p05GMKhqRKmWo3cMv1bRRUbm5OpHoxWbHcIgYFSO+O+6NRNdyJ+raPd8vpaE PJrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nbE9R8nlyJf/HP4Z+6OpjCbpM41qnDIHp+myd8SBPiRpaSxhsvzTQgWTq5QjijLg==
X-Received: by 10.129.114.130 with SMTP id n124mr286799ywc.193.1488899171595; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 07:06:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Russ (162-229-180-77.lightspeed.rlghnc.sbcglobal.net. [162.229.180.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s4sm94291ywa.32.2017.03.07.07.06.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Mar 2017 07:06:11 -0800 (PST)
From: "Russ White" <7riw77@gmail.com>
To: "'Robert Raszuk'" <robert@raszuk.net>, "'Susan Hares'" <shares@ndzh.com>, "'Randy Bush'" <randy@psg.com>
References: <DAEE98CC-8483-499E-B71C-FE4C6FC15A4A@cisco.com> <20170228210627.GB17448@pfrc.org> <3eb4d853-1d44-6250-c70a-26f60eac39e6@cisco.com> <006e01d296db$a7c4c320$f74e4960$@ndzh.com> <CA+b+ERmddHoq+4FmU+Ct3MhH46om8yUt69EoQMyLnzweHF=JgQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERmddHoq+4FmU+Ct3MhH46om8yUt69EoQMyLnzweHF=JgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:06:08 -0500
Message-ID: <020501d29754$59ef7cc0$0dce7640$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQInnAj+Yxa8tap/yfCJFXAjQYwk1wJi0XFfAwzFclUBlnEaYAHWMN+roJiOp3A=
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages@ietf.org, idr-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-20
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:06:15 -0000

> I would like to ask authors to change the below restriction to also consider
> future BGP messages still compliant with RFC4271 RFC. I would therefor
> propose to extend the above sentence with:

I agree with this assessment -- the new extended message type should apply to any message type necessary.

:-)

Russ