Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22] - WG Consensus

"Susan Hares" <> Sat, 14 September 2019 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26D41200C1; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.347
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HcBf5acJz8sE; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDF8812008A; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <>
To: "'Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)'" <>, 'John Scudder' <>,, 'idr wg' <>
References: <004401d561b9$36266e70$a2734b50$> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 09:37:14 -0400
Message-ID: <002701d56b01$852d3750$8f87a5f0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0028_01D56ADF.FE1E0850"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQGqesNOXxkmDkl/EnMys59hj6BO1wMSIeq9AX+bXhsB4eqpLadNcCtQ
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190914-0, 09/14/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22] - WG Consensus
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 13:37:29 -0000



Thank you for all your hard work on this important draft. 




From: Idr [] On Behalf Of Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2019 9:15 AM
To: John Scudder;; idr wg
Cc: Hares Susan
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22] - WG Consensus


Hi All,


The v01 of this draft would be posted shortly that includes updates for addressing the comments which were raised during the WG adoption call as well as those received during the IETF in Montreal. Would request review of these changes and feedback in case any comments still remain un-addressed or require further updates.


The author list has also been updated after discussion between the authors and the chairs.



Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)


From: John Scudder <> 
Sent: 06 September 2019 03:07
To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <>;
Cc: Hares Susan <>; idr wg <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22] - WG Consensus


Hi Ketan, 


I was reminded by the helpful WG chair approval tool that you have more than 5 authors listed. Here's the warning the tool throws:


"This document has more than five authors listed, which is considered excessive under normal circumstances. If you plan to request publication as an RFC, this will require additional consideration by the stream manager (for example, the IESG), and publication may be declined unless sufficient justification is provided. See RFC 7322, section 4.1.1 for details.”


I’d appreciate it if the authors could come to some agreement to reduce the author list. One option is to list just a single editor on the front page and then you can list as may contributors as you like. 


While I await your update or reply, I’ll let the document remain in the approval queue.






On Sep 5, 2019, at 3:48 AM, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <> wrote:


Hi Sue,


We have submitted the draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis-00 with the identical content as was adopted by the WG (i.e. draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01). This version would get posted after your approval.


For all the comments, feedback and inputs received from the WG both during the IETF in Montreal and later during the adoption call, we will publish an updated version 01 next week.


Would request WG participants to review the upcoming v01 and provide inputs if their points have not been adequately covered. We can then continue to work together further.



Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)


From: Idr < <>> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: 02 September 2019 23:37
To: 'idr wg' < <>>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22] - WG Consensus




draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt has been accepted as an IDR Working Group draft..

The authors should resubmit the draft as draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis-00.txt.


I believe that all the questions from WG participants have been answered. 

However, I am not sure if all questions from Nandan Saha and others have been answered.

If you feel your comments or questions have not been answered, please respond to

this email.    


Cheerily, Susan Hares



From: Idr [ <>] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 3:31 PM
To: 'idr wg'
Subject: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22]


This begins a 2 week adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22/2019]


In your comments please indicate “support” or “no support”.  


The chair and AD feel that a revision to RFC7752 is needed

to specify additional error handling.  Please consider

if this draft is a good place to start for this revision.


Cheerily, Susan Hares 

Idr mailing list