Return-Path: X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26D41200C1; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:37:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.347 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HcBf5acJz8sE; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDF8812008A; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:37:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=97.112.17.31; From: "Susan Hares" To: "'Ketan Talaulikar \(ketant\)'" , "'John Scudder'" , , "'idr wg'" References: <004401d561b9$36266e70$a2734b50$@ndzh.com> <3F896711-7F3E-4752-8A00-50831064818C@juniper.net> In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 09:37:14 -0400 Message-ID: <002701d56b01$852d3750$8f87a5f0$@ndzh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0028_01D56ADF.FE1E0850" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Content-Language: en-us Thread-Index: AQGqesNOXxkmDkl/EnMys59hj6BO1wMSIeq9AX+bXhsB4eqpLadNcCtQ X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190914-0, 09/14/2019), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22] - WG Consensus X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 13:37:29 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0028_01D56ADF.FE1E0850 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ketan: =20 Thank you for all your hard work on this important draft.=20 =20 Sue =20 From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ketan Talaulikar = (ketant) Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2019 9:15 AM To: John Scudder; draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis@ietf.org; idr wg Cc: Hares Susan Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt = [8/8 to 8/22] - WG Consensus =20 Hi All, =20 The v01 of this draft would be posted shortly that includes updates for = addressing the comments which were raised during the WG adoption call as = well as those received during the IETF in Montreal. Would request review = of these changes and feedback in case any comments still remain = un-addressed or require further updates. =20 The author list has also been updated after discussion between the = authors and the chairs. =20 Thanks, Ketan (on behalf of co-authors) =20 From: John Scudder =20 Sent: 06 September 2019 03:07 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; = draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis@ietf.org Cc: Hares Susan ; idr wg Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt = [8/8 to 8/22] - WG Consensus =20 Hi Ketan,=20 =20 I was reminded by the helpful WG chair approval tool that you have more = than 5 authors listed. Here's the warning the tool throws: =20 "This document has more than five authors listed, which is considered = excessive under normal circumstances. If you plan to request publication = as an RFC, this will require additional consideration by the stream = manager (for example, the IESG), and publication may be declined unless = sufficient justification is provided. See RFC 7322, section 4.1.1 for = details.=E2=80=9D =20 I=E2=80=99d appreciate it if the authors could come to some agreement to = reduce the author list. One option is to list just a single editor on = the front page and then you can list as may contributors as you like.=20 =20 While I await your update or reply, I=E2=80=99ll let the document remain = in the approval queue. =20 Thanks, =20 =E2=80=94John =20 On Sep 5, 2019, at 3:48 AM, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) = wrote: =20 Hi Sue, =20 We have submitted the draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis-00 with the identical = content as was adopted by the WG (i.e. draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01). = This version would get posted after your approval. =20 For all the comments, feedback and inputs received from the WG both = during the IETF in Montreal and later during the adoption call, we will = publish an updated version 01 next week. =20 Would request WG participants to review the upcoming v01 and provide = inputs if their points have not been adequately covered. We can then = continue to work together further. =20 Thanks, Ketan (on behalf of co-authors) =20 From: Idr < idr-bounces@ietf.org> On = Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: 02 September 2019 23:37 To: 'idr wg' < idr@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt = [8/8 to 8/22] - WG Consensus =20 Greetings:=20 =20 draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt has been accepted as an IDR Working = Group draft.. The authors should resubmit the draft as = draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis-00.txt. =20 I believe that all the questions from WG participants have been = answered.=20 However, I am not sure if all questions from Nandan Saha and others have = been answered. If you feel your comments or questions have not been answered, please = respond to this email. =20 =20 Cheerily, Susan Hares =20 =20 From: Idr [ mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] = On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 3:31 PM To: 'idr wg' Subject: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 = to 8/22] =20 This begins a 2 week adoption call for = draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22/2019] =20 In your comments please indicate =E2=80=9Csupport=E2=80=9D or = =E2=80=9Cno support=E2=80=9D. =20 =20 The chair and AD feel that a revision to RFC7752 is needed to specify additional error handling. Please consider if this draft is a good place to start for this revision. =20 Cheerily, Susan Hares=20 _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr@ietf.org = = https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr__;!= 8WoA6RjC81c!UTbsbxSWiJd2TW1oX9cn9ukgf_qObWfsc7bhmyIf1X0S4mWd2aWEO3u8gCq31= w$=20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0028_01D56ADF.FE1E0850 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ketan:

 

Thank you for all your = hard work on this important draft.

 

Sue

 

From:= = Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ketan Talaulikar = (ketant)
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2019 9:15 = AM
To: John Scudder; draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis@ietf.org; idr = wg
Cc: Hares Susan
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call = for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22] - WG = Consensus

 

Hi All,

 

The v01 of this draft would be posted shortly that includes = updates for addressing the comments which were raised during the WG = adoption call as well as those received during the IETF in Montreal. = Would request review of these changes and feedback in case any comments = still remain un-addressed or require further = updates.

 

The author list has also been updated after discussion = between the authors and the chairs.

 

Thanks,

Ketan (on behalf of = co-authors)

 

From: John Scudder = <jgs@juniper.net>
Sent: 06 September 2019 = 03:07
To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant@cisco.com>; = draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis@ietf.org
Cc: Hares Susan = <shares@ndzh.com>; idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: = Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to = 8/22] - WG Consensus

 

Hi Ketan, =

 

I was reminded by the helpful WG = chair approval tool that you have more than 5 authors listed. Here's the = warning the tool throws:

 

"This document has more than = five authors listed, which is considered excessive under = normal circumstances. If you plan to request publication as an = RFC, this will require additional consideration by the stream = manager (for example, the IESG), and publication may be declined unless = sufficient justification is provided. See RFC 7322, section = 4.1.1 for details.=E2=80=9D

 

I=E2=80=99d appreciate it if the = authors could come to some agreement to reduce the author list. One = option is to list just a single editor on the front page and then you = can list as may contributors as you = like. 

 

While I await your update or reply, = I=E2=80=99ll let the document remain in the approval = queue.

 

Thanks,

 

=E2=80=94John

 

On Sep 5, 2019, at 3:48 AM, Ketan = Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant@cisco.com> = wrote:

 

Hi = Sue,

 

We have submitted the = draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis-00 with the identical content as was adopted = by the WG (i.e. draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01). This version would get = posted after your approval.

 

For all the comments, feedback and = inputs received from the WG both during the IETF in Montreal and later = during the adoption call, we will publish an updated version 01 next = week.

 

Would request WG participants to = review the upcoming v01 and provide inputs if their points have not been = adequately covered. We can then continue to work together = further.

 

Thanks,

Ketan (on behalf of = co-authors)

 

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Susan = Hares
Sent: 02 = September 2019 23:37
To: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for = draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22] - WG Consensus

 

Greetings: 

 

draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt has been = accepted as an IDR Working Group draft..

The authors should resubmit the draft as = draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis-00.txt.

 

I believe that all the questions from WG = participants have been answered. 

However, I am not sure if all questions from = Nandan Saha and others have been answered.

If you feel your comments or questions have not = been answered, please respond to

this email.    

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares

 

 

From:=  Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan = Hares
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 3:31 = PM
To: 'idr = wg'
Subject: [Idr] Adoption call for = draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt [8/8 to 8/22]

 

This = begins a 2 week adoption call for draft-ketant-idr-rfc7752bis-01.txt = [8/8 to 8/22/2019]

 

In = your comments please indicate =E2=80=9Csupport=E2=80=9D or =E2=80=9Cno = support=E2=80=9D.  

 

The = chair and AD feel that a revision to RFC7752 is needed

to = specify additional error handling.  Please consider

if = this draft is a good place to start for this revision.

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares 

__________= _____________________________________
Idr mailing = list
Idr@ietf.org
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr_= _;!8WoA6RjC81c!UTbsbxSWiJd2TW1oX9cn9ukgf_qObWfsc7bhmyIf1X0S4mWd2aWEO3u8gC= q31w$ 

 

------=_NextPart_000_0028_01D56ADF.FE1E0850--