IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] Re: IETF 124 - non-IDR presentations of interest

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 28 October 2025 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: idr@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6197D96177 for <idr@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LVFH5Jk7bdiY for <idr@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0417B7D96158 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 59SIVUUs012721; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:31:30 GMT
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328CF46056; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:31:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269B146055; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:31:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:31:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ioxnode3.iomartmail.com (ioxnode3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 59SIVSkW014325 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:31:28 GMT
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:31:28 +0000
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, idr <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <516805330.145119.1761676288544@www.getmymail.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <5BDA83D4-D934-4253-A6FD-65C1FDE1ED37@pfrc.org>
References: <5BDA83D4-D934-4253-A6FD-65C1FDE1ED37@pfrc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev75
X-Originating-IP: 185.69.145.35
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=date :from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20221128; bh=VST60lHG WF3axJ2DnelYvh3xYmF5GjSO/H1i0tec5Sk=; b=P0jGKqQXQQLZh6cBHXytsDwf fnoOwYjElmXyYRuWU8fl8LKZ/4WX9GG6BaxKYFz/ypsRbrK4V+n3tpDveJTZWx8p hmBdrKdKfhttyuXAZbOdP5XkVRwfVMssPlzAo1vSt/c3VkZK0S6I1JflzDfX3lG1 xZl452ODf+1KT8ZNKeI/H70YjDVRmq9KAG9XiKBirgD8DDGmVGyGzulKEhbfFFLq XSIXNVJCABnSxphcwqTQy5O81cisRq/1V60q2h3KD6t/BE/xuJVrXAKlHpudIYsU Z8fiHTVxhKKivx7aIN5j8B0Pg1lCMm4DWuzNuT1fMCHfY9lJr9eunlLJ+DnCig==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1006-29464.005
X-TM-AS-Result: No--1.511-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--1.511-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1006-29464.005
X-TMASE-Result: 10--1.510500-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 6lay9u8oTUOnvGCyBToTI8G0UNgaZpYqnSd2cRY8xQNWcVQdwdqmz45h luopTaWkbSL9AN4UjltdGdXpDccA9EtHpMdfrXMKnVTWWiNp+v+dNwtHz5PMSm8ksUxxlDnvWHd cLwKAIfAJD1VsRrFV4u7Y3WoX1kj99EnRKjfZsd3+xRIVoKNMvILsLasl5ROhshUUKa5wa6UoxC DWnyhHjoDyCkt8AvqOgr2s+8E6OszpsItySeXEtQXGi/7cli9jywXStpqWmJZLWMri+QqmsbIZR X0zKaDH5dwiVxNvuEHHOEjfW7RqtodUrJoQ7dH4bMGKOuLn5FW4jDZC7GL6ioPWEvGUvG3dYqXV AU4vQBXLmojG/SH2L/++gjOGfzBmAoT9fUllk/VG4E5n+LMUNJpAhsJYhaJrSSmA9VoRjgmjxYy RBa/qJQPTK4qtAgwI9TBysq4cSBYDBun3ky4wIGNkfhZ/mYm9/N9/P5Y462I=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Message-ID-Hash: KMPOZCQWFU2HCLTDK2NPRSJGUEAYB3SM
X-Message-ID-Hash: KMPOZCQWFU2HCLTDK2NPRSJGUEAYB3SM
X-MailFrom: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] Re: IETF 124 - non-IDR presentations of interest
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/JI8gRGmzldgl1qb6yF7iLY69wxo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Jeff,
 
>
> - Distribution of Service Metadata in BGP FlowSpec. The material discusses blending flowspec, the metadata draft (which will have an update in cats as well), coloring mechanisms, and new path attributes.
>
>I didn't think cats was yet chartered to work on protocol extensions.
 
It isn't, and seems unlikely ever to be unless:
- there is a need for a totally new protocol
- another WG wants to give away control of its protocol (which seems unlikely with IDR!)
 
But, as the CATS Framework approaches last call, and as clarity is emerging on what the CATS metrics are, we are taking some time out to hear abput proposals being floated in other WGs that may be applicable to CATS.
 
As cochair of CATS I am conscious that a balance is needed. CATS may need to show interest for a protocol WG to invest time, but it is important that "I presented in CATS" is not used as a false justification.
 
This comment applies to any and all protocol drafts and is not specific to this I-D.
 
Adrian

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status