IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] Re: Suggestions for IANA Considerations (was Re: AD evaluation review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis-07)

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Fri, 05 June 2026 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED7AFBACE9B; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 06:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1780666704; bh=upB58lGsfF/OOs7rHvOQMuIHG6n7HBlAC40DCfq8G20=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=W3VslIY7CMRmy38SpUoQVSaVm2pyC+bVmPRHtRqkLDCMOrAus3P9toXRpypFZl6CE P4cfU/DcOg09vqIGSnmGWcfuoVen8R12dsY+W6IWS+SPin+vFlNexPV3VUHzXR3RFO zudc0C6q08Da45WLwZQZgueAx5Nk/IUYmhWsEa5I=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pfrc.org
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GgtbQzj2zRdy; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 06:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prospero.pfrc.org (prospero.pfrc.org [72.60.64.110]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0410AFBACE93; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 06:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pfrc.org; s=prospero20250622; t=1780666702; bh=upB58lGsfF/OOs7rHvOQMuIHG6n7HBlAC40DCfq8G20=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=gh8jI8vHLQGoyS8a28Dw10H46f97RYOvqhoWXwlogcwuxk+6FKjXko/gQH4w2dkES njTU7S/itR61akRVqMG/Sje37otEpTFD2YHZe3zolbCykEAal7Q3OAjxkXAQIEvhx1 7rYr6zM/TGSSl9DvYmacY4fpRiHISN6sHNRHBYX1ubyJS4/SNckWgXX61F/ShAYbC1 hA7y/6GeNy7LybgYYGZ/WPYbp6ymqus2EEBhSNwP6FghkvjwZfl+aP64aiSHdCeyMU y8hdKlYHnolctGBKIsJOsKEOtrYM2y8meoFTGvzHKr/zaD15ps5xp31axmbZefl+Qb wcLgJ9VH3edXQ==
Received: from [IPV6:2600:1702:80c0:8960:a55c:45b7:f11a:4cc4] (unknown [IPv6:2600:1702:80c0:8960:a55c:45b7:f11a:4cc4]) by prospero.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 914CB80087; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 13:38:22 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <7b33c641-6dbe-49d0-86f9-85010129532b@pfrc.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:38:21 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis@ietf.org, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
References: <CAH6gdPwnTEtCRjCM1CAbqB9J8qxNxLdwbDG7gMXjFZM8t=ncBA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6gdPxaKKikPrGdNELjMdMPdaO-wFo4Zn8rHA3quOQabNuKng@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAH6gdPxaKKikPrGdNELjMdMPdaO-wFo4Zn8rHA3quOQabNuKng@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: LRWZQWAYIYZMEFTBMC2FT5MTYRPJHRJ2
X-Message-ID-Hash: LRWZQWAYIYZMEFTBMC2FT5MTYRPJHRJ2
X-MailFrom: jhaas@pfrc.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Amanda Baber <amanda.baber@iana.org>, Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] Re: Suggestions for IANA Considerations (was Re: AD evaluation review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis-07)
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/JPy8cfJGx39GFaD4nMXy6xWFF3k>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>

Ketan,

If IANA has reviewed the document and is okay to resolve the registry 
linkage issues with the simpler text, I'm happy to support that.  All I 
was waiting on is such acknowledgment to avoid needing to undo the work 
during IANA review.

Having been involved behind the scenes in some of the registry updates, 
I'd rather not deal with another such exercise for the remainder of my 
career.

-- Jeff


On 6/5/26 01:17, Ketan Talaulikar wrote:
>
> The purpose is not to undo or disturb the work on IANA registries 
> already completed by RFC7153 given that no real change is being 
> proposed. It greatly simplifies this document's IANA considerations. 
> This proposal follows consultation with Amanda on the IANA team.
>
> There is also a proposal for a "note" to be added to various 
> transitive/non-transitive EC registries regarding a recommendation of 
> allocating code points which seems like an informal practice that was 
> never captured officially. This comes as a suggestion from IANA.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status