Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-04.txt

Juan Alcaide <jalcaide@cisco.com> Thu, 23 April 2015 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jalcaide@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C111B3029 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 05:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IkxLAM_jTFF2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 05:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 319031B3050 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 05:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=631; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429791141; x=1431000741; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=nRMBj7TKJfi9swQ3V9WaveA9VF4sLQReDC9k0seWrso=; b=JlpJpdUtEUSQJMgMG6WSfu3MnJ7VYv65HW7kRp5HCH9kjiNqIcRcsUNM CVHvVWmDXVr/plYvn1B/LE81/NG2YAIqGr+N353xWFKx2xpwGmO+bJm0y gTHwSP5bfVeLXuv75EHnf83X/OJgaBpioaW5Ji1QCEYGeBTvkcmNH9Yls o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AYBQB74DhV/40NJK1RCoMMUscHgU+GBAKBOTkTAQEBAQEBAYEKhCEBAQMBOAI/EAtGVwaINggNzFIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFQSLN4QnXQeELQWVQodShi6NbCOED4MXAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,630,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="143828882"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2015 12:12:20 +0000
Received: from clubhouse-1.cisco.com (clubhouse-1.cisco.com [64.100.21.13]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3NCCJ27031395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:12:20 GMT
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:12:18 -0400
From: Juan Alcaide <jalcaide@cisco.com>
To: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
In-Reply-To: <D15D7DB9.4E672%wesley.george@twcable.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1504230811270.5542@clubhouse-1.cisco.com>
References: <20150409140218.22830.31521.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D14BFEEA.4CC52%wesley.george@twcable.com> <02e401d072e4$4f5a1cc0$ee0e5640$@ndzh.com> <D14C3347.A438A%aretana@cisco.com> <alpine.GSO.2.00.1504161723090.17655@clubhouse-1.cisco.com> <001f01d07b3f$13ee12f0$3bca38d0$@ndzh.com> <B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F0CB90981@MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com> <alpine.GSO.2.00.1504201548460.29478@clubhouse-1.cisco.com> <20150421202647.GB1600@pfrc> <alpine.GSO.2.00.1504220511220.16159@clubhouse-2.cisco.com> <D15D7DB9.4E672%wesley.george@twcable.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/JU0bv7FmUSfe4TBLgnGY9fg_2ws>
Cc: "'idr@ietf.org'" <idr@ietf.org>, "'jgralak@juniper.net'" <jgralak@juniper.net>, "UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>, 'Susan Hares' <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-04.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:12:52 -0000

>
> WG] It doesn't really describe any vendors' implementations anymore, but
> rather an amalgam of multiple implementations, and one of the only places
> that it does (section 4.1 title) was a mistake that Alvaro caught and I
> have already fixed in the pending revision. I'd encourage you to re-read
> the latest draft and identify any places where we are still naming one
> vendor's implementation such that we need to discuss the naming of others,
> because we probably need to fix that too.

My bad then.. I was looking at 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-04. Where can I 
find the latest?