IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Thu, 20 December 2012 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBCF21F89F2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:32:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dhTq59eeoJLl for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:32:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.acquirer.com (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1DF21F89C1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:32:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: <idr@ietf.org>
Received: from crumpet.dyn.netability.ie (pancake.netability.ie [87.198.142.197]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.acquirer.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBKGUn3Z049438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:30:50 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
Message-ID: <50D33D9D.3070400@foobar.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:32:29 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: idr@ietf.org
References: <B6B72499-E9D0-4281-84EB-6CA53694866E@juniper.net> <D704E7E3-3A95-4696-9757-9E17605E670C@tony.li> <378E396E-3F4B-4ACC-83D1-C4931524FECD@puck.nether.net> <CA+b+ERneavhy1gzKRSnCfN+YjYcU0+3WgBg6f68gq=tpx8yV5g@mail.gmail.com> <1AC79BDA-C088-47B4-888D-4B0428FB7C4F@puck.nether.net> <B549F708-0D5E-4B22-AC91-B6CE61B258FE@tony.li> <CAL9jLaZdX_jem0JdSGHzuhc3GDZXMDR0kvMKq5xr3D-EWYbNVQ@mail.gmail.com> <20121129191043.GA9189@puck.nether.net> <50D328DC.2020906@umn.edu> <20121220152721.GA3551@puck.nether.net> <50D33972.8090302@umn.edu>
In-Reply-To: <50D33972.8090302@umn.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:32:39 -0000

On 20/12/2012 16:14, David Farmer wrote:
> I'm OK with the focus being on outbound filtering and outbound filtering
> and being required with a "MUST" clause.

I don't think the IETF is too hot on the idea of "MUST" appearing in non
normative documents?

Nick

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status