Re: [Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04.txt (11/1 to 11/16)

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Mon, 02 November 2020 09:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2E83A0B9D for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 01:13:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XsnFroeui1HI for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 01:13:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F95E3A0E99 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 01:13:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1298; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1604308400; x=1605518000; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Oe1qWfWwQ2RaTRR/VXrPwicUABN7Ix8kdXXx3j4xsxI=; b=YLHmwlakELenTZdjmsuDQ8CTcZFmF8clOh1tW6pKw1du1/G0y2q61rZC hRsebpJnLWH2a1o0YaNnJeW15kNkjbFMezCU2pNHWBR5VWVLyWMyCRwds nGnL6RVXj3M9IbKL6kWvapr9GUm28XZV5IjvOwROenqRTs/o11CFos1ej c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DpBwBrzJ9f/xbLJq1iHgEBCxIMQIRpVQEgEoRriQWHZS6aQYFoCwEBAQ8lBwECBAEBg0sBfgKCCSY4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBHGFYQyFcwEFIw8BBVEIAw4KAgImAgJXBgEMCAEBgyIBgnwPrSl2gTKEUkFEgz6BPAaBDiqJJ4QugUE/gREngj0uPoJdAgIBAYEmARIBgziCXwSQJqd4gnaDGYVvghiPWgUHAx+DGIoRhSKPH5NKiniVb4FrI2dwMxoIGxWDJU8mjisXFIhOhUVAA2gCBgEJAQEDCXQIjUwBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,444,1596499200"; d="scan'208";a="30729649"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 02 Nov 2020 09:13:16 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.51] (ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com [10.60.140.51]) by aer-core-1 (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0A29DFbS028839; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 09:13:15 GMT
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr@ietf.org
References: <03d401d6b0be$96cde8c0$c469ba40$@ndzh.com>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <5750a169-1f9d-5cc1-08ec-1f451c50944c@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 10:13:15 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <03d401d6b0be$96cde8c0$c469ba40$@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.51, ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/JofdkQ3Bv9ERv4-m7KWsCLGrChg>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04.txt (11/1 to 11/16)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 09:13:50 -0000

Hi Susan,

I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPRs related to this draft.

thanks,
Peter

On 02/11/2020 03:19, Susan Hares wrote:
> This begins a 2 week WG LC for  draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04.txt
> 
> (11/1 to 11/16).
> 
> The authors should send their IPR statements by Tuesday (11/3)
> 
> or this WG LC will be extended 1 extra week.
> 
> You can access the draft at:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo/
> 
> This draft is also needed to match BGP work to LSR specification
> 
> for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-13.txt (at IESG).
> 
> There are 2 Cisco implementations of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo.
> 
> Details on the implementations are at:
> 
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo%20implementations
> 
> WG members should consider in their response:
> 
> a) Are there technical issues with the flexible algorithm technology?
> 
> b) Is this draft ready for publication?
> 
> c) Will this technology aid LSR deployments?
> 
> d) Are you concerned about the 2 implementations coming
> 
> only from Cisco?
> 
> If you know of any other planned implementations, please send
> 
> Chairs this information or respond to this email to inform the WG.
> 
> Cheers, Susan Hares
>