IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Sat, 05 November 2016 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25C612942F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 10:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sjMlupUoJFsJ for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 10:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21CB8129400 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 10:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id p190so107523579wmp.1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 10:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=gRvwT3e6LjCEl0q0lwrdXGb39L3WOuAL9N81kUTdI/I=; b=XDn4bW+tJX0Lod+G+3bgsqZK7LJ1GxAynrLImer+z1LF0haIaOHVz9YUWdj8gsSfVJ 3mqquBlMSBbenJyLthYCklvJxor6L9/8GPTWs8ezhnMKrXmg9sWfK1g1yem8tRDAGs3K 36wrAwmnXbAubEkEqK0GbyIYLwyxVClQqp8lY3VbThIEcWyn8Q5GzimY+6RhUp8cEtpw tmj+3aSamSJS4rKFxkAjSV0Op1kOui7ml//SnzVkwIZKKI9Hv9UdU4iNfOzT5PEnAL1Y q221BTIngctGT6tu0PMe9t3TKpJIjmyeR9iJg1Klz/2NJYijq5NzSZZYvHNamf3HpZjJ uWPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gRvwT3e6LjCEl0q0lwrdXGb39L3WOuAL9N81kUTdI/I=; b=jdR55CXH7EwOROoYRDHOkHFAeJR4uOQ8XCXOBRrVFTyP1+ir4bOsPEkrnD0Jxn1dF0 bGR+pkH6femwBLy5ITocb3H1w+S2PNurO9+gOCGT7hlaMeYLpp5RSwXOl88iraGtCQvm 14rufa9EzlJnD9iJ/Um+e+ZQtLFf52mvLsU5Q2J+iJHl2q0y1ZF9j7RnBe1uzkvYWMwU zJoRQ0cCrdUGtP0T/Ln5v4AevScj3VGiD/yIIhgaro11VoFBLvOzoA0sNLHXX2ZXlmoI Pip/r7UX0NbZWbZV3ZDDa2/VGR/i32kaCVWlhRiR5NTW21HwxXtLvsXx89de95J3XdwF HaqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfKtY6A8WcMGgGyYRxww19BAoWCMKot/wHx5uWambAJ8u2A5zibhPvpZfYCntIP8CDWaAZqm8UYcLH/pw==
X-Received: by 10.28.46.15 with SMTP id u15mr2367514wmu.61.1478366317720; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 10:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.80.137.69 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 10:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20161105103526.GM952@Vurt.local>
References: <6c5d83aa1d6a4a04b651b8f14f4b445b@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <40D942F5-0710-46D1-BF09-76C827377479@cisco.com> <95F42982-7DCF-46A9-A26C-71EF70DB3C59@apnic.net> <20161104195346.GK961@Vurt.local> <20161104201631.GA35942@Vurt.lan> <8a293ce4fc134657aa98134b5017d92e@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <20161104221030.GD37681@Vurt.lan> <0919e676e12d49d1a2ba30f4acc3b273@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <20161104230536.GJ37681@Vurt.lan> <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858C87AFC6E@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <20161105103526.GM952@Vurt.local>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2016 18:18:36 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: TSbNUJDDROQvGk3kSslaPldZdjM
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERnRJ5Ko9XXF+_wxRUeWVGV5NuwmewSo0nGg-cCyBQNx2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1142532c373dad054090fbe3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/KAbvkLa4M0hQnhitIWL5nAOfWHc>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2016 17:18:41 -0000

Hi Job,

> By default, the BGP speaker does not send/transmit community
> > attributes. Even if the COMMUNITIES path attribute is an optional
> > transitive attribute. This is the current reality application.
>
> *​​Then change your default!*
>

​Are you making a recommendation here ​that BGP implementations should now
be modified to send BGP communities to EBGP (and obviously IBGP) peers by
default ?

Do you mean that only for large communities or also for standards and
extended communities ?

I think Shunwan's point is very valid and it seems by making above
recommendation to modify the BGP implementations default you agree with it.
If so draft should reflect this as this is no longer market nor EBGP peers
agreement.

Thx,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email