Re: [Idr] BGP: Vendor Specific Capabilities

Kalpesh Zinjuwadia <kzinjuwadia@force10networks.com> Tue, 22 April 2008 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <idr-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-idr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7264F3A6E83; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFEE3A68D2 for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S9QLcRgvHN0f for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.force10networks.com (corp.force10networks.com [64.186.164.204]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCEF3A6E7A for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.force10networks.com ([10.11.0.221]) by mx.force10networks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:23:16 -0700
Received: from exch7-sjc-fe.force10networks.com ([10.11.0.87]) by mx.force10networks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:23:15 -0700
Received: from EXCH-CLUSTER-09.force10networks.com ([10.11.10.113]) by exch7-sjc-fe.force10networks.com ([10.11.0.87]) with mapi; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:23:16 -0700
From: Kalpesh Zinjuwadia <kzinjuwadia@force10networks.com>
To: "'sundeep.mudgal@nokia.com'" <sundeep.mudgal@nokia.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:23:14 -0700
Thread-Topic: BGP: Vendor Specific Capabilities
Thread-Index: AcikjoQkoBpWMXC5QH2LtLt9J2knWgADp51Q
Message-ID: <2EE638FFD18B294395AE688204CE7E6F1DFC1B05@EXCH-CLUSTER-09.force10networks.com>
References: <E5E76343C87BB34ABC6C3FDF3B31272702427B7B@daebe103.NOE.Nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <E5E76343C87BB34ABC6C3FDF3B31272702427B7B@daebe103.NOE.Nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Apr 2008 17:23:15.0922 (UTC) FILETIME=[8CCE7320:01C8A49D]
Subject: Re: [Idr] BGP: Vendor Specific Capabilities
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0234905480=="
Sender: idr-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org

Implementation can choose either way. RFC3392 states that "the decision is local to the speaker".

Thanks,
Kalpesh

From: idr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of sundeep.mudgal@nokia.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 8:36 AM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] BGP: Vendor Specific Capabilities



Hi,

        Could you please confirm whether vendor-specific capabilities should be ignored or responded to with the unsupported capability message?

Thanks,
Sandeep Mudgal
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr