Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-hr-idr-rfc5575bis-02 "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules"

"Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <> Fri, 10 February 2017 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5CD129A81 for <>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:27:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eaaldXwftKR6 for <>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:27:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE6D2129A80 for <>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:27:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=20816; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1486751268; x=1487960868; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=kFxn2njuxBFMGqkRvLkhHM/AVJOMY3XpYJoYFdzACKw=; b=NGKXbtMDh5G1AA38dfepWSqqB9bRadEfuO17tt07AcyjkIzNWN2fiD/6 tn5T/5sNJSU0YweNxVB3I7vijynarREsn8dEieRIBoxqXk4HrUuYSRhKZ RLKZadGEGJfSV39XsMH16AwmTgA+aOxGNi+paQ3/AbK8vWH1gT020XAYD A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,142,1484006400"; d="scan'208,217";a="196844246"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 10 Feb 2017 18:27:47 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1AIRlJD026301 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:27:47 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:27:47 -0600
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:27:46 -0600
From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <>
To: "" <>, John Scudder <>, idr <>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-hr-idr-rfc5575bis-02 "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules"
Thread-Index: AQHSc/eQ4UTAgffgtEa6ctzvf3aiWKFWl5SAgAtiBNmAALNN8A==
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:27:46 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>, <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_cb6e8bf073524492a6c688369fc197bfXCHALN014ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-hr-idr-rfc5575bis-02 "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules"
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:27:50 -0000

IPv4 is still very much in use, regardless of the "historic" label.


From: Idr [] On Behalf Of
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 11:40 PM
To: John Scudder <>et>; idr <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-hr-idr-rfc5575bis-02 "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules"

Hello All,

I support the adoption of your draft. But I want to ask a question. rfc5575bis is for IPv4, as stated in the abstract. However, IPv4 is declared to be historic. Do we still need a RFC specifically designed for IPv4?

Best Regards,


From: John G. Scudder<>
Date: 2017-02-03 03:49
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-hr-idr-rfc5575bis-02 "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules"

It was pointed out to me that due to Chinese New Year, a significant number of WG members may not have had the opportunity to respond (I don't know what everyone else's excuse is...). We will extend the adoption call until February 13 unless there are objections. (If there are objections feel free to unicast them to me, or send them to the list, as you prefer.)



> On Jan 21, 2017, at 10:03 AM, John G. Scudder <> wrote:
> Hi All,
> The authors have requested IDR working group adoption of draft-hr-idr-rfc5575bis-02 "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules". Please send your comments to the list.
> This adoption call will conclude on Monday, February 6.
> Thanks,
> —John
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list

Idr mailing list