Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)

Aijun Wang <> Mon, 08 February 2021 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1C43A0DC2 for <>; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 18:07:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.918
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F-yE6K95sEkw for <>; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 18:07:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B02783A0E26 for <>; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 18:07:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP2IOH5QC (unknown []) by (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 679BB1C0180; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:07:40 +0800 (CST)
From: Aijun Wang <>
To: 'Susan Hares' <>,
References: <010e01d6fb0b$c5c08970$51419c50$>
In-Reply-To: <010e01d6fb0b$c5c08970$51419c50$>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 10:07:39 +0800
Message-ID: <003d01d6fdbf$2dd457c0$897d0740$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003E_01D6FE02.3BFACC10"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQG1smfZprFU7mP/HezyWekZ+lQr16qQEoOQ
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Tid: 0a777f64fbc9d993kuws679bb1c0180
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 02:07:47 -0000


Hi, Susan and All:


As co-author of this draft, I support its adoption. 

The related questions are answered below inline[WAJ].


Thanks in advance for your efforts.


Best Regards


Aijun Wang

China Telecom


From: <> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 11:38 PM
Subject: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021
to 2/18/2021)


This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (from
2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021) 


This draft defines a new Outbound Route Filter (ORF) type, called the

Route Distinguisher ORF (RD-ORF).  RD-ORF is applicable when the

routers do not exchange VPN routing information directly (e.g.

routers in single-domain connect via Route Reflector, or routers in

Option B/Option AB/Option C cross-domain scenario).


Please be aware that this draft has one IPR statement attached. 



Please consider the following questions in your review and comments: 


1)      Will this new ORF filter reduce routing information at key points? 

[WAJ] Yes, it will filter dynamically the overwhelming VPN routing
information at the other side of the BGP peer, preserve the serving
capabilities for other VPNs on the local router.


2)      Should the WG consider this draft given it has an IPR claim or 

[WAJ] Yes.

Would the IDR WG prefer another approach? 

[WAJ] Other approaches are welcome, except the approaches that has been
discussed on the mail list, or mentioned in the draft. 

We are also welcome IDR experts to make contributions to refine the current


3)      Is this draft ready to be adopted and refined as WG draft? 

[WAJ] Yes. The draft has been presented twice on the IETF meetings,
discussed intensely in the mail list and updated several versions to address
the comments from WG mail list.  It will be refined after becoming the WG



Cheerily, Susan Hares