Re: [Idr] IPR call prior to WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-09.txt
Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Wed, 05 August 2020 11:02 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF43A3A1057 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 04:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bSgBqqFxjseS for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 04:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9276D3A0B30 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 04:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.100.94;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'tom petch' <ietfc@btconnect.com>, idr@ietf.org
Cc: 'John Scudder' <jgs=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <005401d6659d$31ad4c40$9507e4c0$@ndzh.com> <AM7PR07MB6248692A07C082915D32C002A04D0@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR07MB6248692A07C082915D32C002A04D0@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 07:01:58 -0400
Message-ID: <017001d66b17$d74ee4e0$85ecaea0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQE+1+XUdv18vKGZHbbpBPNUlsIwVQIJDnJFqkg13QA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200805-2, 08/05/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/KWwqTNSJ1yyjqwWusdr0hnpMFio>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR call prior to WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-09.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:02:12 -0000
Tom: John and Jie will be taking forward the processes. John will have the final judgement judging the IPR call and consensus. Starting the IPR call is not normally seen as conflicting. If you have concerns about my starting the IPR call, I can ask John to start the IPR call again noting that I am a co-author. Sue -----Original Message----- From: tom petch [mailto:ietfc@btconnect.com] Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 5:38 AM To: Susan Hares; idr@ietf.org Cc: John Scudder Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR call prior to WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-09.txt Sue Since you are listed as an author of this I-D, it would seem appropriate if your co-chair was the one responsible for taking this I-D forward in all its processes, starting with this call. Tom Petch ________________________________________ From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Sent: 29 July 2020 12:41 To: idr@ietf.org Subject: [Idr] IPR call prior to WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-09.txt This begins an IPR call in preparation for a WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-09.txt. Cheerily, Susan Hares
- [Idr] IPR call prior to WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] IPR call prior to WG LC for draft-ietf-… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [Idr] IPR call prior to WG LC for draft-ietf-… Susan Hares
- [Idr] some thoughts on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-0… tom petch
- Re: [Idr] IPR call prior to WG LC for draft-ietf-… tom petch
- Re: [Idr] some thoughts on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-mod… Scharf, Michael
- Re: [Idr] some thoughts on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-mod… tom petch
- Re: [Idr] IPR call prior to WG LC for draft-ietf-… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] some thoughts on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-mod… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] IPR call prior to WG LC for draft-ietf-… tom petch
- Re: [Idr] IPR call prior to WG LC for draft-ietf-… John Scudder
- Re: [Idr] some thoughts on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-mod… tom petch
- Re: [Idr] some thoughts on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-mod… tom petch