Re: [Idr] Some editorial issues related to draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-04
"Dhanendra Jain (dhjain)" <dhjain@cisco.com> Mon, 10 September 2018 18:29 UTC
Return-Path: <dhjain@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D761130F44 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id veCdUWbsUI_t for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A232130F41 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=14424; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1536604180; x=1537813780; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=Vw/rqNWDq3tUMyIeZg9Fv43II503vcoyV7U2rcLeZhc=; b=lQh/dgeLD3h36Oa6vml9fM1QI340obcylPIqPSJY7jrENlnaeSF54KWi DtylQgsHW6CzWjVKYQ8znueRNGAx3N7EXSKkGwe7oUsgaS+B+H/0g6uhd CqIoFMUtpS4JGjCsD+ehtbuh+4GnW+volvxR72ca9ims7FBHKq/PuvpYO M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AfAQDLt5Zb/5xdJa1cGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEIAQEBAYJXd2V/KAqDaIgTjB+CDZEBhTMUgWYLhGwZg2MhNBgBAgEBAgEBAm0ohTgBBiNoAQgRAQIBAisCBDAXBgoEARKDIQGBHWSlGIEuhGyFFoplF4FBP4ESJx+CHi6ERliCYTGCJgKNMo5WCQKQABeBQIQ/iHGTZgIRFIElHTiBVXAVOyoBgkGCJRcRjgZvjHmBHQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,356,1531785600"; d="scan'208,217";a="447216075"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Sep 2018 18:29:14 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (xch-rcd-006.cisco.com [173.37.102.16]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w8AITErC021703 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:29:14 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-007.cisco.com (173.37.102.17) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:29:13 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-007.cisco.com ([173.37.102.17]) by XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com ([173.37.102.17]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:29:13 -0500
From: "Dhanendra Jain (dhjain)" <dhjain@cisco.com>
To: Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Some editorial issues related to draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-04
Thread-Index: AQHUSTQsqg+fVlHdTk2qiwZkm4H/gg==
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:29:13 +0000
Message-ID: <71A5C106-A4EA-44EC-9AA2-5D33BBF4054D@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.e.1.180613
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.131.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_71A5C106A4EA44EC9AA25D33BBF4054Dciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.16, xch-rcd-006.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/KfIOaI17r0RXb2LfgqgGQ9Mbyxs>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Some editorial issues related to draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-04
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:29:42 -0000
Hi Shunwan, The Types in this section reflect the list of defined Segment Types from SR Policy architecture doc. The type code within sub-TLVs corresponding to the Segment Types (9,10,11) are shifted by 1 to accommodate existing Weight sub-tlv type code (9). These Segment Types were added later. This is reflected in IANA code point table in section 8.4. HTH, Dhanendra From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com> Date: Saturday, September 8, 2018 at 2:01 AM To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org> Subject: [Idr] Some editorial issues related to draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-04 Dear authors, Thank you for providing a good document for us. There may be some editorial issues in this document. Page 14 of draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-04 has the following texts: Type 1: SID only, in the form of MPLS Label Type 2: SID only, in the form of IPv6 address Type 3: IPv4 Node Address with optional SID Type 4: IPv6 Node Address with optional SID for SR MPLS Type 5: IPv4 Address + index with optional SID Type 6: IPv4 Local and Remote addresses with optional SID Type 7: IPv6 Address + index for local and remote pair with optional SID for SR MPLS Type 8: IPv6 Local and Remote addresses with optional SID for SR MPLS Type 9: IPv6 Node Address with optional SID for SRv6 Type 10: IPv6 Address + index for local and remote pair with optional SID for SRv6 Type 11: IPv6 Local and Remote addresses for SRv6 Since "Type 9" has been assigned to Weight Sub-TLV per draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-04, so above texts would be as follows: Type 1: SID only, in the form of MPLS Label Type 2: SID only, in the form of IPv6 address Type 3: IPv4 Node Address with optional SID Type 4: IPv6 Node Address with optional SID for SR MPLS Type 5: IPv4 Address + index with optional SID Type 6: IPv4 Local and Remote addresses with optional SID Type 7: IPv6 Address + index for local and remote pair with optional SID for SR MPLS Type 8: IPv6 Local and Remote addresses with optional SID for SR MPLS Type 10: IPv6 Node Address with optional SID for SRv6 Type 11: IPv6 Address + index for local and remote pair with optional SID for SRv6 Type 12: IPv6 Local and Remote addresses for SRv6 If I don't understand it correctly, please give me some help. Thanks, Shunwan
- [Idr] Some editorial issues related to draft-ietf… Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [Idr] Some editorial issues related to draft-… Dhanendra Jain (dhjain)