IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC for IPR

"Anoop Kapoor (ankapoor)" <ankapoor@cisco.com> Mon, 14 March 2016 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ankapoor@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C159512DC54; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i1L4w-pL8NQW; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F12E912D67E; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11533; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1457978231; x=1459187831; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Kp4rwZEiFY7jx0Gjfe6UHPhnHvGF0HVs2QVXtg8v1DI=; b=I1gow9GRIsUskPJLFtv7clbT59HLM4S1Y/Guqb8jy9U2Ox57UcDd+RDt /dizrYrv+/0724QxGL7y5Vi0ZHxjW2NeIO/w2VFbRmRZNgztGwzfWOliV W//wuKhaC0iT24soBzvdJ6sxK2tFajZQkdEF0EVK0cKPS1HSeP26XVeio E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A3AgBN+uZW/5NdJa1XBoJ6TFJtBrowAQ2BcCOFagKBMDgUAQEBAQEBAWQnhEEBAQEELUwQAgEIEQMBAQEoBzIUCQgBAQQBDQWIDwMSDrtUAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQSGGIRCgj2BXgEBDTANCYQEBZMDhEgBhW2IEo8FjnwBHgEBQoIDGYFIagGJMDR+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.24,336,1454976000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="80602566"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Mar 2016 17:57:10 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2EHv9tc005914 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:57:10 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:57:09 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-012.cisco.com ([64.101.220.152]) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com ([64.101.220.152]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:57:09 -0400
From: "Anoop Kapoor (ankapoor)" <ankapoor@cisco.com>
To: "Tomotaki, Luis M" <luis.tomotaki@verizon.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC for IPR
Thread-Index: AdFgTvATc4xhvDpqSdanGhK2hw1rbACTy0rgBueBbgD//5wLgA==
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:57:09 +0000
Message-ID: <D30C493A.16EFB4%ankapoor@cisco.com>
References: <002401d16050$5cba52e0$162ef8a0$@ndzh.com> <467340A77F13C944919805BFF3B8ACFC30119EA786@FHDP1LUMXC7V91.us.one.verizon.com> <D30C48F5.13E08A%gdawra@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D30C48F5.13E08A%gdawra@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.8.151023
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.57.125]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D30C493A16EFB4ankapoorciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/KfyZi7-fEGEnjT90O7DdcHnCMsU>
Cc: "draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC for IPR
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:57:14 -0000

Support.

Anoop
From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of "Tomotaki, Luis M" <luis.tomotaki@verizon.com<mailto:luis.tomotaki@verizon.com>>
Date: Monday, February 8, 2016 at 11:32 AM
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>, "idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>" <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Cc: "draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC for IPR

Susan,
  No, I am not aware of any IPR related to this document that has not already been disclosed.

Luis Tomotaki

From: Susan Hares [mailto:shares@ndzh.com]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 2:04 PM
To: idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>
Cc: 'Shitanshu Shah (svshah)'; draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange@ietf.org>; 'Alvaro Retana (aretana)'; 'John G. Scudder'
Subject: WG LC missed IPR Statements - 1 WG LC for IPR

After a long review/edit cycle after WG LC, draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-07.txt is ready to go to the IESG.   You can see the resulting text at:
 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange/

However, in checking the IPR statements the IDR chairs missed two steps in the process:

Step 1:  There was IPR declared in the mail message regarding  draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange-03:  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/rPvMVsFcM4xOm1Vz_HNdAM3P250

This IPR is unusual in that the holder of the patent is not one of the authors of the draft as the link shows:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?id=draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange&submit=draft

As a WG Chairs, we must ask again if the WG wants to approve the draft in the face of this patent.  This begins a 1 Week IPR LC where the WG must send positive indications they wish to send this document to WG LC.  This message was sent prior to the WG LC (1/19/2015 to 2/5/2015), but no specific mention was made.  Due to IPR policy, we must get a positive affirmation that the WG LC wants to adopt this work.  All authors to the draft MUST respond to this IPR call or we cannot forward this to the IESG for publication.

Details on these implementations of draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange are at:
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/idr/trac/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-sla-exchange%20implementations


Step 2:  three of the authors did not declare IPR on-list:  Keyur Patel,  S. Bajaj,  L. Tomotaki

These authors need to declare if they know if additional IPR.

Thank you for your patience,

Sue Hares and John Scudder

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email