From nobody Thu Nov 19 18:50:57 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54FDC3A16E6 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:50:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.348 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qYeAUVsSrIZY for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:50:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E7F73A16F0 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:50:28 -0800 (PST) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.115.222; From: "Susan Hares" To: Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 21:50:19 -0500 Message-ID: <005b01d6bee7$e5c60110$b1520330$@ndzh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005C_01D6BEBD.FCF2B830" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ada+59IulOzED8v7Sb6jd+WHT3UYdw== Content-Language: en-us X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 201119-8, 11/19/2020), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com Archived-At: Subject: [Idr] Complete status for IDR for IETF 109 X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 02:50:56 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005C_01D6BEBD.FCF2B830 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings: The status as of 11/20/2020 (Asia time). Please send me email if you requested adoption at IETF 109. I want to make sure I have all requests in the minutes. Cheerily, Sue ------- RFC editor queue 1) draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-27 - 2) draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-19 3) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-16 Past IETF LC 1) draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-20 Status: Awaiting AD go ahead Next step: IESG Review Shepherd: Susan Hares 2) draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis-08 Status: Post IESG review, Awaiting AD follow-up Shepherd: Susan Hares 3) draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19 Status: Post IESG review, AD follow-up, on upper layer Shepherd: John Scudder IESG Publication request done 1) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-12 Status: AD's queue (134 days) 2) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-01 Status: AD's Review done, WG response needed Shepherd: Jie Dong Issue: Discussion at IETF 109 on intent 3) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-21 Status: AD's queue, 7 days Shepherd: Susan Hares 3) draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-09 Status: AD queue, 7 days Shepherd: Susan Hares 4) draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-12 Status: IESG publication requested, AD's queue (0 days) Shepherd: Susan Hares Awaiting Shepherd's report 1) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-13 Status: Shepherd's in progress, ETA for shepherd: 11/21/2020 Note: Editorial changes on security section and Enforcement/error handling pending Shepherd: Susan Hares 2) draft-ietf-rs-bfd-09.txt Status report: Shepherd Verifying implementations ETA: 11/21/2020 (response on implementation check) Shepherd: Susan Hares 3) BGP-LS group (will be forwarded as group) a) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04 b) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-03 c) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions-03 d) draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-04' Shepherd: Susan Hares Status: Initial Shepherd Report ETA: 12/7/2020 Next steps: All author groups should recheck Implementation reports as WG LC appears to have consensus. Note: Additional reviewers with BGP-LS experience are needed to review the documents. Past WG LC awaiting implementations 1) draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-l2vpn WG LC: 6/24 to 7/8/2020 Shepherd: Susan Hares WG adopted: (11/1 to 11/16) 1. draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu-04 (will be renamed draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-link-mtu-00.txt) Status: IDR will adopt if WG adoption successful, but If LSR adopts may transfer to LSR For single draft in LSR for IGP and BGP. Next step: 11/15 announcement of adoption status 2. draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04 Shepherd: Susan Hares Status: Adoption in process, some support Next step: 11/15 announcement of adoption status Adoption request pending: 1) draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-bgp-only-fabric-05 Dates: (11/16- 11/30) Status: Some interest, but more needed to adopt Shepherd: Susan hares Early Allocation completed: 1) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04#section-5 1045 (suggested) - Flex Algorithm Exclude SRLG TLV Early Allocations requested: 1) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kaliraj-idr-bgp-classful-transport-pl anes Status: Needs investigation by shepherd Shepherd: TBD, assigning 2) Request from Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang zzhang@juniper.net Status: Need the latest draft reference for IANA allocation Shepherd: Susan Hares Reason for Delay: Evaluation of draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps. Will Jeffrey please contact me offline. ------=_NextPart_000_005C_01D6BEBD.FCF2B830 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Greetings: =

 

The status as of 11/20/2020 (Asia time).  =

 

Please send me email if you requested adoption at IETF = 109.  I want to make sure I have all requests in the minutes.  =

 

Cheerily, Sue

 

-------

 

RFC editor = queue

1) draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-27 = –

2) = draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-19  

3) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-16 =

 

Past IETF LC

1) <= span = style=3D'font-size:11.5pt;color:#3D22B3;background:#F9F9F9;text-decoratio= n:none'>draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-20

    Status: Awaiting AD go = ahead

    Next = step:  IESG Review

    Shepherd: Susan Hares =

 

2) draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis-08

    Status: Post IESG review, Awaiting = AD follow-up

    = Shepherd: Susan Hares

  

3) draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19

    Status: Post IESG review, AD = follow-up, on upper layer

    Shepherd: John = Scudder

 

 

IESG = Publication request done

 

1) = draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-12

     Status: AD’s queue (134 = days)

 

2) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-01

   Status: AD’s Review done, WG = response needed

   Shepherd:  Jie Dong =

   Issue:  = Discussion at IETF 109 on intent

 

3) = draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-21

  Status: AD’s queue, 7 days =   

   Shepherd: Susan Hares =

 

3) <= span = style=3D'font-size:11.5pt;color:#3D22B3;background:white;text-decoration:= none'>draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-09

   Status: AD queue, 7 days =  

   Shepherd: Susan = Hares

 

 4) draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-12

     Status: IESG publication = requested, AD’s queue (0 days)

     Shepherd: Susan Hares =

 

 

Awaiting = Shepherd’s report

 

1) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-13

    Status: Shepherd’s in = progress,

    ETA for shepherd: =  11/21/2020

   =  Note: Editorial changes on security section

        and = Enforcement/error handling pending

    Shepherd: Susan Hares =

 

  2) draft-ietf-rs-bfd-09.txt

     Status report: Shepherd = Verifying implementations

     ETA: 11/21/2020 = (response on implementation check)    

     Shepherd: Susan Hares =

 

3) BGP-LS group (will be forwarded as group) =

  a) = draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04

  b) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-03

  c) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions-03

d) = draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-04’

 

  = Shepherd: Susan Hares

  Status:  Initial Shepherd = Report

  ETA:  12/7/2020 =

  Next steps:  All = author groups should recheck

         &= nbsp;    Implementation reports as WG LC appears to =

         &= nbsp;    have consensus. 

   Note: Additional reviewers with = BGP-LS experience

         &= nbsp;  are needed to review the documents. =   

 

 

Past WG LC = awaiting implementations  

1) = draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-l2vpn

    WG LC: 6/24 to 7/8/2020 =

    Shepherd: = Susan Hares

 

         &= nbsp;           &n= bsp; 

WG adopted: (11/1 to = 11/16)

1. = draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu-04

   (will be renamed = draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-link-mtu-00.txt)

   Status:  IDR will adopt if WG = adoption successful, but

         &= nbsp;      If LSR adopts may transfer to = LSR

         &= nbsp;     For single draft in LSR for IGP and = BGP.

    Next = step:  11/15 announcement of adoption status

 

2. <= span = style=3D'font-size:11.5pt;color:#3D22B3;background:white;text-decoration:= none'>draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04

    Shepherd: Susan = Hares

   Status:  = Adoption in process, some support

    Next step:  11/15 announcement = of adoption status

 

Adoption = request pending:

 

1) draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-bgp-only-fabric-05

    Dates: (11/16- 11/30) =

    Status: Some = interest, but more needed to adopt

    Shepherd: Susan hares =

 

 

Early = Allocation completed:

1)  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04#s= ection-5

 

    1045 (suggested) - Flex = Algorithm Exclude SRLG TLV

 

Early Allocations requested:

1) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kaliraj-idr-bgp-c= lassful-transport-planes

Status: = Needs investigation by shepherd

Shepherd:  TBD, assigning

 

2) Request = from Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang zzhang@juniper.net =

Status: Need the latest draft = reference for IANA allocation

Shepherd: Susan Hares

Reason for Delay:  Evaluation of = draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps.

Will = Jeffrey please contact me offline.

 

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_005C_01D6BEBD.FCF2B830--