[Idr] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Wed, 15 February 2017 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBAD129BDB; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:39:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.947
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gvyAMHC0erL4; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:39:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CE17129BCF; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:39:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:34:44 -0500
Message-ID: <00f901d287e4$16ecb2f0$44c618d0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00FA_01D287BA.2E176E40"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdKH5ALnHgVYM3zURr+F4Gs1EKSVZg==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/LTwAUcIwNCx0ZvPhNhhsZ0q0-JM>
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 23:39:39 -0000

This begins a 2 week IDR WG last call on
draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe from (2/15 to 3/1/2017)    There
are two implementations describe on the wiki at: 



The two implementation are from  Cisco IOS-XR release 6.0.2 and Cisco Nexus
Switch N9000/N3000 platforms running NX-OS 7.0(3)I1(1) or greater.   The
authors will indicate on the list and in the wiki the following information


1)      Were these implementations separate implementations? 

2)      What were the results of the interoperability tests? 


This work is linked to the draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe
work in the SPRING WG. Based on the two drafts, the WG should might

1)      Is there need for this work in deployments in networks/ 

2)      Is this technically ready for publication? 

3)      Does it fit with the spring informational draft? 


For the ease of reference the web references are below: 




Sue Hares