Re: [Idr] Returning draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis to WG, new 2 week discussion period

John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> Tue, 09 July 2019 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC16120A5C; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IhAoMTOXfIXB; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB42120A4D; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108160.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x69IYSnh009251; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:38:16 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=Feas9ozaWSl691QecP1yrtXShWX5TVAs77C5Ge/Am+0=; b=anjJGTT8t/sskGJCelNgMJ/F+Kfx9AAFTcM58Yn5xGPefvAU19bppYthvo5wNYSjXFhL JPiwjCXGEXN+FNNahmlRvIBBkuUTYXjFNzR6c7NnglsZT4EwDPN8ZbEFimE3PK21sLXl 2d2MpYgg/35v9jtM9SZ211NJP6rmdgBfjspIVKIZ3XnlM5nSBthEmDFln44/RPEj/m3T RWF6iuUUsQrnQfHnrwFK6i1pfsGtT22e90higAXedGOR2yOUmxWTkEJN4UcesT+LVIUR hXVMNlhUUxWZr1epGClJDWHx/VI7Z4YUovVM/wakkhS4Uc/Nu6dtwBWYDwTtLdIno8al PA==
Received: from nam03-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03lp2051.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.42.51]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2tmw5h8cht-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:38:16 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=hmlRFUjMXjNBRELmxf/b4Cm6f4hwWSUZiacrBgI1QdFWxt9jfjFg8dAmz6hNjGlRZF0OKM9VLEXSmhSxdQSLcXD9UhLCtWGFrVLks+FBNZxdc2kyMNWjfXwUZhxcJlwCwiEge/5DFYFuZVb6QnNkgl7Zy0vbF8nFCh65xPCR8WjZXx5D9WwIYhe4sTdJLckx4mpz3LIFhkv7Eg0cKI754wU0tSxvN8xDJcep9Z5o6+2fgyK7GVovPk3ROXGQcfTXX41BnPB9Rs706YYvuNgGQdJ94utcC9X59hvo/gt98EJ4HvVHai2/2j3Q8xNGsaLLIxUjSJ8IuWSZxBeo2P/rjA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Feas9ozaWSl691QecP1yrtXShWX5TVAs77C5Ge/Am+0=; b=WaGK6sJU8Pyp24b5S2t5f5wGXtx0uNvKq+KFoo3T4afqNRXudOrtf4sKlQQ6p02gRXexGAA4O9Afz7GeTuxjQwKXMvkX5sw91zYED4tOmM0zM2xXQtibMkxmvGMJdnb5QwsUxBd4ty4t96eF84UCgrRBPEq0dTVwi9/z45gGzLugFh5ffNKl98sM5+R/8tuVCx4fZ20R1trtuOCBOXJOcdBNtkQdbp4z+3iGtJQx0ZZTng10HfB69fhBQLral2uw3XMPhUBAeDHNFLYoHwcTzpNLcB6Nb8L8OeSiNXyZH2oxlN/jimA25sQ/oImfvIhZH3Szw3JEN2MF0ZUMYTSn2A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1;spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net;dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net;arc=none
Received: from DM6PR05MB4714.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.176.109.215) by DM6PR05MB6556.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.178.226.215) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2073.10; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 18:38:14 +0000
Received: from DM6PR05MB4714.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c25:d8b1:d2ac:dd61]) by DM6PR05MB4714.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c25:d8b1:d2ac:dd61%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2073.008; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 18:38:14 +0000
From: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
To: Hares Susan <shares@ndzh.com>
CC: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Returning draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis to WG, new 2 week discussion period
Thread-Index: AQHVIg9pKPaPu9Gxr0iKbfFqqdX3ZqaZ9n6AgAcxhICACjvggIAVms+AgAHIHYA=
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 18:38:13 +0000
Message-ID: <285ECB0B-A72A-4490-B4AC-25DEA632E41D@juniper.net>
References: <A68BF050-9846-4E14-918D-297548E078A2@juniper.net> <99A607F0-84C5-4D3D-99EF-36B733DE205A@tix.at> <5126B079-AD79-4645-9A90-F960A3BB20F3@tix.at> <C5C1B7D3-75C4-4113-9623-7ACB9202CFC2@juniper.net> <004501d535a1$68b09f30$3a11dd90$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <004501d535a1$68b09f30$3a11dd90$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [162.225.191.79]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8d6f9499-6edd-43a4-b5d3-08d7049c99fa
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DM6PR05MB6556;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR05MB6556:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR05MB655624061F95B9DBA9489959AAF10@DM6PR05MB6556.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0093C80C01
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(396003)(366004)(53754006)(189003)(199004)(76176011)(6486002)(236005)(8676002)(478600001)(81156014)(6512007)(6506007)(102836004)(6916009)(71190400001)(66556008)(66476007)(66446008)(64756008)(73956011)(33656002)(53546011)(6436002)(36756003)(966005)(25786009)(6246003)(5660300002)(68736007)(2906002)(71200400001)(7736002)(6306002)(54896002)(6116002)(26005)(3846002)(229853002)(606006)(86362001)(8936002)(186003)(256004)(14444005)(4326008)(2616005)(486006)(476003)(11346002)(81166006)(66066001)(66946007)(54906003)(99286004)(446003)(76116006)(316002)(53936002)(14454004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR05MB6556; H:DM6PR05MB4714.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 5RQ5Rvec5xt3hbu1DPapeULuhgmNbDcTNyD4D8Xdv4ocKcir3WWalDJpphRXFnldhvQYYxPU4qF7j7HOZeJUlAPDS2QE82xjAfsZmOVr191BPLkFffnfdxnHD0bb1RnW/UpOcXVtjXfbpNPEUWqUFEC4Qx7/XNR1lqHinGJIsIcyuLMo0jXStllCXp8lFx6cKy3FwdH1I2eaIdrhsJIExwR1LsADqO0QJfHSeeP6iOmLI1zBOPspI+bF1GQJOw/CnLlem0Pc79oEk7aO7zTTimJ0z4N2SYJIF+qB2HXgRNITfA/F/3mQZzLEhGp9w3SrAhiJwpjjBtrwdECE8vJFmVBSpME7RiJMUm06u+X+e0K7e5pKqF+reDTFz2odGm7EjbFcDrC+FLrhMgJ1X/KVSZ5+UJRKcWXavRlI/UflCS4=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_285ECB0BA72A4490B4AC25DEA632E41Djunipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8d6f9499-6edd-43a4-b5d3-08d7049c99fa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Jul 2019 18:38:13.9309 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: jgs@juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR05MB6556
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-07-09_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1907090218
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/LobPr3JpH4eoSdeONt5MalnRNO8>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Returning draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis to WG, new 2 week discussion period
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 18:38:27 -0000

Thanks, Sue.

Yes, I will be finishing up document processing this afternoon.

—John

On Jul 8, 2019, at 11:25 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>> wrote:

John and WG:

Thank you for taking care of this validation issue.   While we had agreed to limit the extensions to RFC5575, this extensions is needed to fix the validation issues in RF5575.  I strongly agree to the fix.

Since John has not pushed the “send” yet, I can only assume he was waiting for my response.

Cheers,
Sue Hares



From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Scudder
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 5:30 PM
To: idr@ietf. org
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Returning draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis to WG, new 2 week discussion period

Hi All,

Just to reiterate, the -17 text Christoph uploaded will be what goes forward to the IESG unless there are any objections by Friday. The diff vs. version -16 is here, https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-17..txt<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_rfcdiff-3Furl2-3Ddraft-2Dietf-2Didr-2Drfc5575bis-2D17.txt&d=DwMFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=hLt5iDJpw7ukqICc0hoT7A&m=vtSRkqrC-AhEfdso69W5oSg-lxB7sXWqceXQUhytQpo&s=g8neX9yzjFKAGsMVrOalz1fOB2YDSh_yExHOL2OdyDo&e=>


On Jun 18, 2019, at 2:13 AM, Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at<mailto:c@tix.at>> wrote:

After some discussion on the list and also off-list I uploaded a new version of the draft (-17) that seems to have enough support from the WG (basically what John suggested initially). If there are very strong arguments against this change, please suggest a different fix to the problem John pointed out. John wanted to keep the discussion open until 28th June.

Thanks to Christoph and the other authors for jumping on this.

—John