IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Returning draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis to WG, new 2 week discussion period

John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> Tue, 09 July 2019 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC16120A5C; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IhAoMTOXfIXB; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB42120A4D; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108160.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x69IYSnh009251; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:38:16 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=Feas9ozaWSl691QecP1yrtXShWX5TVAs77C5Ge/Am+0=; b=anjJGTT8t/sskGJCelNgMJ/F+Kfx9AAFTcM58Yn5xGPefvAU19bppYthvo5wNYSjXFhL JPiwjCXGEXN+FNNahmlRvIBBkuUTYXjFNzR6c7NnglsZT4EwDPN8ZbEFimE3PK21sLXl 2d2MpYgg/35v9jtM9SZ211NJP6rmdgBfjspIVKIZ3XnlM5nSBthEmDFln44/RPEj/m3T RWF6iuUUsQrnQfHnrwFK6i1pfsGtT22e90higAXedGOR2yOUmxWTkEJN4UcesT+LVIUR hXVMNlhUUxWZr1epGClJDWHx/VI7Z4YUovVM/wakkhS4Uc/Nu6dtwBWYDwTtLdIno8al PA==
Received: from nam03-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03lp2051.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.42.51]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2tmw5h8cht-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:38:16 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=hmlRFUjMXjNBRELmxf/b4Cm6f4hwWSUZiacrBgI1QdFWxt9jfjFg8dAmz6hNjGlRZF0OKM9VLEXSmhSxdQSLcXD9UhLCtWGFrVLks+FBNZxdc2kyMNWjfXwUZhxcJlwCwiEge/5DFYFuZVb6QnNkgl7Zy0vbF8nFCh65xPCR8WjZXx5D9WwIYhe4sTdJLckx4mpz3LIFhkv7Eg0cKI754wU0tSxvN8xDJcep9Z5o6+2fgyK7GVovPk3ROXGQcfTXX41BnPB9Rs706YYvuNgGQdJ94utcC9X59hvo/gt98EJ4HvVHai2/2j3Q8xNGsaLLIxUjSJ8IuWSZxBeo2P/rjA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Feas9ozaWSl691QecP1yrtXShWX5TVAs77C5Ge/Am+0=; b=WaGK6sJU8Pyp24b5S2t5f5wGXtx0uNvKq+KFoo3T4afqNRXudOrtf4sKlQQ6p02gRXexGAA4O9Afz7GeTuxjQwKXMvkX5sw91zYED4tOmM0zM2xXQtibMkxmvGMJdnb5QwsUxBd4ty4t96eF84UCgrRBPEq0dTVwi9/z45gGzLugFh5ffNKl98sM5+R/8tuVCx4fZ20R1trtuOCBOXJOcdBNtkQdbp4z+3iGtJQx0ZZTng10HfB69fhBQLral2uw3XMPhUBAeDHNFLYoHwcTzpNLcB6Nb8L8OeSiNXyZH2oxlN/jimA25sQ/oImfvIhZH3Szw3JEN2MF0ZUMYTSn2A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1;spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net;dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net;arc=none
Received: from DM6PR05MB4714.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.176.109.215) by DM6PR05MB6556.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.178.226.215) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2073.10; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 18:38:14 +0000
Received: from DM6PR05MB4714.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c25:d8b1:d2ac:dd61]) by DM6PR05MB4714.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c25:d8b1:d2ac:dd61%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2073.008; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 18:38:14 +0000
From: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
To: Hares Susan <shares@ndzh.com>
CC: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Returning draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis to WG, new 2 week discussion period
Thread-Index: AQHVIg9pKPaPu9Gxr0iKbfFqqdX3ZqaZ9n6AgAcxhICACjvggIAVms+AgAHIHYA=
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 18:38:13 +0000
Message-ID: <285ECB0B-A72A-4490-B4AC-25DEA632E41D@juniper.net>
References: <A68BF050-9846-4E14-918D-297548E078A2@juniper.net> <99A607F0-84C5-4D3D-99EF-36B733DE205A@tix.at> <5126B079-AD79-4645-9A90-F960A3BB20F3@tix.at> <C5C1B7D3-75C4-4113-9623-7ACB9202CFC2@juniper.net> <004501d535a1$68b09f30$3a11dd90$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <004501d535a1$68b09f30$3a11dd90$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [162.225.191.79]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8d6f9499-6edd-43a4-b5d3-08d7049c99fa
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DM6PR05MB6556;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR05MB6556:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR05MB655624061F95B9DBA9489959AAF10@DM6PR05MB6556.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0093C80C01
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(396003)(366004)(53754006)(189003)(199004)(76176011)(6486002)(236005)(8676002)(478600001)(81156014)(6512007)(6506007)(102836004)(6916009)(71190400001)(66556008)(66476007)(66446008)(64756008)(73956011)(33656002)(53546011)(6436002)(36756003)(966005)(25786009)(6246003)(5660300002)(68736007)(2906002)(71200400001)(7736002)(6306002)(54896002)(6116002)(26005)(3846002)(229853002)(606006)(86362001)(8936002)(186003)(256004)(14444005)(4326008)(2616005)(486006)(476003)(11346002)(81166006)(66066001)(66946007)(54906003)(99286004)(446003)(76116006)(316002)(53936002)(14454004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR05MB6556; H:DM6PR05MB4714.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 5RQ5Rvec5xt3hbu1DPapeULuhgmNbDcTNyD4D8Xdv4ocKcir3WWalDJpphRXFnldhvQYYxPU4qF7j7HOZeJUlAPDS2QE82xjAfsZmOVr191BPLkFffnfdxnHD0bb1RnW/UpOcXVtjXfbpNPEUWqUFEC4Qx7/XNR1lqHinGJIsIcyuLMo0jXStllCXp8lFx6cKy3FwdH1I2eaIdrhsJIExwR1LsADqO0QJfHSeeP6iOmLI1zBOPspI+bF1GQJOw/CnLlem0Pc79oEk7aO7zTTimJ0z4N2SYJIF+qB2HXgRNITfA/F/3mQZzLEhGp9w3SrAhiJwpjjBtrwdECE8vJFmVBSpME7RiJMUm06u+X+e0K7e5pKqF+reDTFz2odGm7EjbFcDrC+FLrhMgJ1X/KVSZ5+UJRKcWXavRlI/UflCS4=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_285ECB0BA72A4490B4AC25DEA632E41Djunipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8d6f9499-6edd-43a4-b5d3-08d7049c99fa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Jul 2019 18:38:13.9309 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: jgs@juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR05MB6556
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-07-09_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1907090218
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/LobPr3JpH4eoSdeONt5MalnRNO8>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Returning draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis to WG, new 2 week discussion period
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 18:38:27 -0000

Thanks, Sue.

Yes, I will be finishing up document processing this afternoon.

—John

On Jul 8, 2019, at 11:25 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>> wrote:

John and WG:

Thank you for taking care of this validation issue.   While we had agreed to limit the extensions to RFC5575, this extensions is needed to fix the validation issues in RF5575.  I strongly agree to the fix.

Since John has not pushed the “send” yet, I can only assume he was waiting for my response.

Cheers,
Sue Hares



From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Scudder
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 5:30 PM
To: idr@ietf. org
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Returning draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis to WG, new 2 week discussion period

Hi All,

Just to reiterate, the -17 text Christoph uploaded will be what goes forward to the IESG unless there are any objections by Friday. The diff vs. version -16 is here, https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-17..txt<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_rfcdiff-3Furl2-3Ddraft-2Dietf-2Didr-2Drfc5575bis-2D17.txt&d=DwMFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=hLt5iDJpw7ukqICc0hoT7A&m=vtSRkqrC-AhEfdso69W5oSg-lxB7sXWqceXQUhytQpo&s=g8neX9yzjFKAGsMVrOalz1fOB2YDSh_yExHOL2OdyDo&e=>


On Jun 18, 2019, at 2:13 AM, Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at<mailto:c@tix.at>> wrote:

After some discussion on the list and also off-list I uploaded a new version of the draft (-17) that seems to have enough support from the WG (basically what John suggested initially). If there are very strong arguments against this change, please suggest a different fix to the problem John pointed out. John wanted to keep the discussion open until 28th June.

Thanks to Christoph and the other authors for jumping on this.

—John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email