Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-08, to end September 25

Randy Bush <> Tue, 08 September 2020 20:03 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5E43A10C1; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e_D7fpD4oIGL; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E677B3A10BD; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([] by with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <>) id 1kFjqB-0001fH-KO; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 20:03:43 +0000
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:03:43 -0700
Message-ID: <>
From: Randy Bush <>
To: John Scudder <>
Cc: Interminable Discussion Room <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-08, to end September 25
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 20:03:47 -0000

i think we have multiple flavors of signaling.  i am not sure there is a
crisp taxonomy, but some of the spaces could be describes as

  o hard core routing data, bgp classic

  o state signals, please chill out i am gonna sleep/restart/die

  o conditions, the circuit's bandwidth, color, delay, flavor

  o policies, prefix limits, code flavor, ...

and we're trying to squeeze them all into some funny containers, bgp
tlvs, capabilities, bgp-ls, ...; most of which were designed for other

as you point out, draft-ietf-idr-operational-message is another
container which kinda tried to hold some of these.  it could certainly
deal with the proposal at hand.

but it sure would be nice if we had a little archetectural structure
and regularity here.