[Idr] Mohamed Boucadair's Yes on draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth-21: (with COMMENT)

[Mohamed Boucadair via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Mohamed Boucadair has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth-21: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Pradosh, Reshma, Satya, Serge, Rafal, and Akshay,

Thank you for the discussion and for addressing the comments raised in my
previous ballot [1].

The changes made since my first review are great [2]. The description of the
attribute may be enhanced by indicating the scope of the bandwidth value:

CURRENT:
    Local Administrator sub-field:
             Bandwidth value (bytes per sec) encoded as 4 octets
             in IEEE 754 32-bit floating point format.

Thanks again for the sustained effort and perseverance over 16 years to publish
this useful feature as an RFC.

Cheers,
Med

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/ruu3Q1NHPIRt7kak1Am9RsHilPo/

[2]
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth-19&url2=draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth-21&difftype=--html