[Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4271 (6707)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 13 October 2021 15:04 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D4F3A0B18 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aEcfGlhiXN-a for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 675E93A0B0C for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 4A178D8505; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com, yakov@juniper.net, tony.li@tony.li, skh@nexthop.com, idr@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20211013150428.4A178D8505@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:04:28 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/M1s1OpkgwPoWh26nzxk9XPiQYfk>
Subject: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4271 (6707)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:04:33 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4271, "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6707 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Section: 6.8 Original Text ------------- If a pair of BGP speakers try to establish a BGP connection with each other simultaneously, then two parallel connections well be formed. Corrected Text -------------- If a pair of BGP speakers try to establish a BGP connection with each other simultaneously, then two parallel connections will be formed. Notes ----- s/well be formed/will be formed Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC4271 (draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-26) -------------------------------------- Title : A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4) Publication Date : January 2006 Author(s) : Y. Rekhter, Ed., T. Li, Ed., S. Hares, Ed. Category : DRAFT STANDARD Source : Inter-Domain Routing Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4271 (6707) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4271 (67… Chris Smiley