IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Pete Resnicks Discuss on draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 19 February 2015 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5931A882F; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:40:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4fgj9YwnhWYo; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:40:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [198.180.150.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8314C1A874E; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1YOSHE-0003Yk-7H; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:40:28 +0000
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 23:40:25 +0900
Message-ID: <m24mqi7yna.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <005e01d04c49$ad2e9860$078bc920$@ndzh.com>
References: <ouvqvstjq0yjnm8cfv0fwext.1424351342995@email.android.com> <005e01d04c49$ad2e9860$078bc920$@ndzh.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Meh751hz4tjhDrhcvijeQpNwYN0>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Pete Resnicks Discuss on draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:40:43 -0000

> We debated the bcp versus the rfc.  The problem is that these behavior
> change the fundamental assumptions that bgp in a way that impacts
> sidr.

and there is a corresponding, equally over-wordy, companion draft in
sidr.

randy

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status