Re: [Idr] [GROW] draft-snijders-idr-shutdown-00: Drop a line in the peer's syslog at shutdown

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Sun, 20 November 2016 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2B5129466; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:10:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hFIeVjgoGB9m; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:10:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x244.google.com (mail-qk0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B971129424; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:10:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x244.google.com with SMTP id x190so43369526qkb.0; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:10:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=l3f8vWQNZqOUbXSOshbPt/MI+0WYP4Wir5+2xmLr7oo=; b=LA6Kkk/q06tTxcwOq0m0d9c59XNeSAlLR3H+fHr3Grlg2K0bBh1kQobD2kYc/zckAQ u0J/hekcBYl1MgYHCCX0RDilTn9tXsL6e0yXirMdljTxOcaZzBur7cFHxye3qNm9g6NK PTrXF6UrRtIarRxXtv0CTM211+VY1Mpb+i1Ubu35lkuGDz1CSpnoY9F7CULwbEEa0+Ca t4Y2eJPeHVsSV527dwA7O7SVFZySI+euXcbGcB2IwS9j/M6uIJDAKDbBO2Q0YbUUWBTR stDjdBg8aWFOAkon4716lhrr/bHVFcPAPfJEEwSjAjkNtU86yVNOCLT9YDOwkhYDuD91 zrFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=l3f8vWQNZqOUbXSOshbPt/MI+0WYP4Wir5+2xmLr7oo=; b=BgFmEDT5s15qx0DA7UK9SZUuzW5YCt6tFDytt+MTN/fxN8kzuJdfXernF5tTaZQoL1 GG/hkUrOojgxNZqWWRwpbgNeKZqgIml6RwIYVdeTWjoMFvNY0Gib3fsXR6Be1sFC2y/Y 7u3RYyFllXwum5tAKaXuo6TN/B642DlpltFrITcLXSFSniWV0UG5Q0y1vA7k6pRH3jUV htoayi9Iy/JBs3p24OiNa6C4mAA1bXMRKWKXZYbmtBmkU+5bETJnR98NkraILmn1e2dO 6VUb1gfumzIgjS1XfIy4g1vpSs/z0hcslLhSwCUquzNSWoQw54pwksS3RdA/QmnSAC9q sJPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03/72EhxsWcVL7feGG3HJB9+rLHjaL3bTVAYI+eoaIgLvBbzA4rk8U72NChvBwansRNCdl0szBV12pyYA==
X-Received: by 10.55.81.8 with SMTP id f8mr12274676qkb.101.1479683438181; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:10:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.16.50 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:10:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.16.50 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:10:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ER=TECdo0XyH6Pkf-Te1hCUm82DXWw1p-Yf2OeTfnATc_g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <FBD63625-3E82-44AC-9318-D6B6DFE86082@domino.org> <CAO367rVSyeBcJnt8yogV27POyS3VwWGCqgmD3ex79dUPN-Misg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=EFuQ8L_A4VtdzWna4ZNM-rhPo8gXURaN2s3WAykrL+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAO367rX9gBfNHgqmy0NqiNMGkjzLRATj6PdiDYk_M1fAQx5s8g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkMsCGhyHsttjq0Pout0vrAvGQ6F+HaTxr8=78YMeRFOA@mail.gmail.com> <58306620.4000308@foobar.org> <319AD952-C571-4085-8D56-C06A51F021E3@domino.org> <CA+b+ERnQ8FQXxJ6No6GUr9mdp7APRkULqsGbKf5bAigp34TvmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAO367rW_TuXsMNJBanAc2gL66TW8s4p2u5zDKfHER5rb1rk7-Q@mail.gmail.com> <058F756D-3A68-4AA6-A9DC-63A1BF9A5184@domino.org> <20161119194138.GG47336@dhcp-9d92.meeting.ietf.org> <87DDAB88-78AC-431A-ABE7-55249BF5D654@domino.org> <5830CAEB.7070400@foobar.org> <f35845b1-cfe6-acb8-c3d0-2bc46a43d6f6@lahai.com> <83A8E52C-DBD8-4321-99A0-58672EBE5430@domino.org> <CA+b+ERk=bvO3P63jvsHYqgevAR-1btfGGX_6OakqjpqLPSXC7A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=TECdo0XyH6Pkf-Te1hCUm82DXWw1p-Yf2OeTfnATc_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:10:36 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: NgmU0RRHsdIRZHnANl1zQRD6diY
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=+j2yXcSyiOfYUVXmaV0OBSxrqgJA=ZFp-1gLDuf_XyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@domino.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114a8d5eb684cd0541c3a54d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Mg7bxmMa7baVFnpWVAxcppzVxIo>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] [GROW] draft-snijders-idr-shutdown-00: Drop a line in the peer's syslog at shutdown
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:10:40 -0000

I am not suggesting TLV format. Just few  optional and predefind keywords
for those who like your peer to be able to parse it.

I am not taking away anything you are proposing just adding few words which
can help.

What is the problem of accepting it ?

Thx
R.

On Nov 20, 2016 21:02, "Neil J. McRae" <neil@domino.org> wrote:

I would be deploying automation to take care of network
problems/issues/whatever whether I worked at BT or I was the admin of a
network with four and a half nodes.

We have the world and his wife automating and innovating on top of -our-
internet platform and we are still encouraging behaviours like it was 1992
(I'd say like mission control in the 60s but I think they had more
automation back then!)

oh well if we just want to be the dumb pipe providers!

> On 20 Nov 2016, at 18:34, Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab@lahai.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/19/16 9:58 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>> Regarding the I-D, there are ~55000 asns visible in the dfz, of
>> which ~6000-7000 are non-leaf, and probably less than a thousand
>> where bgp session automation makes financial sense.  No doubt,
>> as5400/2856 would be in the top bracket of these and it would make
>> sense for your tooling teams to automate the hell out of nearly
>> everything, which would militate against accepting free-form advisory
>> shutdown notices like this - but then again, BT is atypical in the
>> general scheme of things. Whether you like it or not, the long tail
>> of ASNs would benefit from a simple mechanism of this form.
>
> that sums it up neatly for me. I also think that adding complexity in
> the free form at this stage may limit implementation and the numerous
> ways in which it can be used for automation.
>
> I see these quite similar to TXT records in DNS. and so, I do think that
> at some point after this has been implemented, we'll need to document
> widely adopted structures in a BCP.
>
> -gaurab
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow